期刊文献+

当事人陈述证据价值之思考——以《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》为视角 被引量:8

On the value of the party’s statement——On《The supreme court’s some rules about the evidence in the civil procedure》
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2001年最高人民法院通过对民事诉讼证据规则的解释,对我国民事诉讼体制作出了重大的调整,从而对当事人陈述的证据地位产生了巨大的冲击。这一规则所确定的法律真实的证明标准、建立的自认制度逐步瓦解了当事人陈述作为证据存在之基础,且由于当事人陈述自身所难以克服的虚假性,决定了当事人陈述作为一种独立证据形式存在已经失去意义。 The administrative courts have been in an embarrassed position in China: On the one hand, they must do their endeavors to acquire the comprehension and co-ordination of the executives for fulfilling their judicial responsibilities; On the other hand, they must establish their own authorities by controlling the executives to get their social position. It is difficult for administrative courts to strive for their social positions under the present judiciary systems. To reform the judiciary systems and political systems in China is the only Way for them to attain the goal.
作者 陈文曲
机构地区 中南大学法学院
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第4期409-412,425,共5页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
关键词 证据规则 当事人陈述 自认 administrative courts the executives complaisance control
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献2

共引文献9

同被引文献76

引证文献8

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部