摘要
死刑核准权已经收归了最高人民法院,这种经历了辩证否定的权力回归是法治的胜利。但是随着相关司法解释的出台与施行,最高人民法院复核死刑的程序还存在一些纰漏和不足,如审理方式问题、对被告人进行讯问的问题、人民检察院及被害人是否应当参与的问题、辩护权问题、证明标准问题等仍然需要进一步地探讨和完善。
The right to approve death sentences to the Supreme People's Court has resumed the experience of the dialectical negation of the right of return of the rule of law victory. But with the relevant judicial interpretations promulgated and implemented, the Supreme People's Court to review the procedures for the death penalty there are still some flaws and shortcomings, such as the mode of trial; the questioning of the accused, the problem; People's Procuratorate, and whether victims should be involved in the issue; the right to defense; Standard of Proof issues still need to further explore and perfect.
出处
《吉林公安高等专科学校学报》
2007年第4期84-88,共5页
Journal of Jilin Public Secunity Academy
关键词
死刑复核程序
不足
程序完善
Death penalty review procedures, disadvantage, procedure improvement