期刊文献+

三峡水库大宁河流域非点源污染参数的不确定性分析 被引量:14

Analyzing parameter uncertainty of the non-point source pollution in Daning River of the Three Gorges Reservoir area
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以大宁河流域为研究区,在基于参数敏感性分析的基础上,分别选取对径流量、泥沙负荷、有机氮和有机磷模拟计算最敏感的前10位参数,采用FOEA(first-order error analysis)不确定性分析方法,分析这些参数对非点源负荷不确定性的影响.结果表明,仅有少数几个参数对模型输出结果的不确定性有显著影响,这些参数对不确定性的贡献在90%以上.对泥沙负荷、有机氮、有机磷模拟计算的不确定性影响最大的是径流曲线数,说明非点源污染负荷的不确定性主要受径流产生过程的参数的影响.在径流量、泥沙负荷、有机氮和有机磷4个输出结果中,泥沙的不确定性最大. Using Darting River watershed as study area, based on parameter sensitivity analysis, ten first most sensitive simulated calculating parameters of the runoff amount, silt load, organic N and organic P were chosen respectively, and the uncertain analysis method of FOEA (first-order error analysis) was adopted to analyze the influence of these parameters on the non-point source uncertainty.Only a few parameters had remarkable influence on uncertainty of the model output result, and contribution of these parameters for simulation results was higher than 90%. The greatest influence on the uncertainty of simulated calculating of silt load, organic N and organic P was runoff curve number, indicating that the uncertainty of non-point source pollution load was influenced mainly by the parameters of the runoff producing process. In the four output results of runoff amount, silt load, organic N and organic P, the uncertainty of silt was the greatest.
作者 余红 沈珍瑶
出处 《中国环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期554-558,共5页 China Environmental Science
基金 国家"973"项目(2003CB415204)
关键词 非点源污染 FOEA 不确定性 non-point source pollution first-order error analysis uncertainty
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1陈友媛,惠二青,金春姬,邱汉学,吴德星.非点源污染负荷的水文估算方法[J].环境科学研究,2003,16(1):10-13. 被引量:81
  • 2李怀恩.流域非点源污染模型研究进展与发展趋势[J].水资源保护,1996,13(2):14-18. 被引量:46
  • 3任磊,黄廷林.水环境非点源污染的模型模拟[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2002,34(1):9-13. 被引量:19
  • 4郝芳华,任希岩,张雪松,程红光.洛河流域非点源污染负荷不确定性的影响因素[J].中国环境科学,2004,24(3):270-274. 被引量:35
  • 5Zhang H X. The critical flow-storm approach and uncertainty analysis for the TMDL develop process [D]. Charlottesville: University of Virginia, 2001,
  • 6Francos A, Elorza F J, Bouraoui F, et al. Sensitivity analysis of distributed environmental simulation models: understanding the model behaviour in hydrological studies at the catchment scale [J] Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2003, 79:205-218.
  • 7Catherine Freissinet, Michel Vauclin, Marc Erlich. Comparison of first-order analysis and fuzzy set approach for the evaluation of imprecision in a pesticide groundwater pollution screening model [J]. Contaminant Hydrology, 1999,37:21-43.
  • 8Omlin M, Reichert P. A comparison of techniques for the estimation of model prediction uncertainty [J]. Ecol. Model, 1999,115:45-59.
  • 9Melching Charles S, Yoon Chun G. Key sources of uncertainty in QUAL2E model of Passaic River [J]. Water Resources Planning and Management, 1996,122(2): 105-113.
  • 10Catherine Freissinet, Michel Vauclin, Marc Edich. Comparison of first-order analysis and fuzzy set approach for the evaluation of imprecision in a pesticide groundwater pollution screening model [J]. Contaminant Hydrology, 1999,37:21-43.

二级参考文献31

共引文献168

同被引文献286

引证文献14

二级引证文献160

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部