期刊文献+

SF-36量表在乙型肝炎患者生存质量测量中的可行性评价 被引量:10

Feasibility of the MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey in the Assessment of the Quality of Life in Hepatitis B Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价SF-36量表在乙型肝炎患者生存质量测量中的可行性。方法对150例乙型肝炎患者的测量结果,考核量表应答率、Cronbach α系数、内容效度、结构效度和甄别力等进行评价。结果SF-36量表各维度的条目能被全部回答的比例范围是94.8%-97.8%,维度分数能被计算的比例范围是98.5%-100.0%;各维度Cronbach’sα系数范围是0.513-0.934;9I条目与VT维度的相关系数为0.334,其余大于0.4;VT维度与构想的生理健康强相关不一致;VT和MH维度不能表现出应该有的区别患者与正常人、疾病的严重程度上的差异。结论从总体上看SF-36量表用于测定乙型肝炎患者具有比较好的信度、效度,但不够全面。 Objective To evaluate the feasibility of the MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) in the assessment of the quality of life in Hepatitis B patients. Methods The responsiveness, Cmnbaeh α coefficient, content validity, construct validity and diserinfinate of the SF-36 were examined. Results The range that all items were responded in 8 domains is 94.8% - 97.8%. The range flint all domains were scored is 98.5% - 100%. Cmnbaeh α eoefficaient of 8 domains ranged from 0.513 to 0.934. The correlation coefficient of dm 9I item with VT domain is 0.334, of the others are all above 0.4. The VT domain is inconsistent with it' s conceived. The VT and MH domains can not discriminate the patients with non-patients. Conclusion SF-36 has good reliability and validity as a whole, bat can not assess all facets of the Hepatitis B patients.
出处 《中国预防医学杂志》 CAS 2007年第4期352-355,共4页 Chinese Preventive Medicine
基金 福建省卫生厅青年研究基金资助(2002-1-2)
关键词 SF-36量表 生存质量 乙型肝炎 可行性 MOS 36-item short form healtl survey Quality of life Hepatitis B Feasibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献50

  • 1王荷,苗京亚.慢性乙型肝炎患者自我保健状况的调查[J].东南国防医药,2003,5(6):412-414. 被引量:6
  • 2陈仲庚.艾森克人格问卷的项目分析[J].心理学报,1983,15(2):211-218. 被引量:380
  • 3朱元珏.评估生命质量逐渐成为临床试验的新标准[J].中华内科杂志,2003,42(11):753-753. 被引量:50
  • 4池肇春.实用临床肝病学[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,1999.202-206.
  • 5Younossi ZM, Guyatt G, Kiwi M, et al. Development of a disease specific questionnaire to measure health related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut, 1999, 45: 295-300.
  • 6Bayliss MS. Methods in outcome research in hepatology definition and domain of quality of life. Hepatology, 1999, 29(suppl 1): 35-65.
  • 7Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12.
  • 8Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF,et al.Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults.J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:1051-1060.
  • 9Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D.Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432.
  • 10Gandek B, Ware JE Jr.Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach.International Quality of Life Assessment.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:953-959.

共引文献2303

同被引文献126

引证文献10

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部