中国士兵人格问卷-Ⅱ的信度研究

Reliability of Chinese soldier personality questionnaire-Ⅱ （CSPQ-II）

目的 探讨中国士兵人格问卷-Ⅱ（CSPQ-Ⅱ）的信度。方法 使用中国士兵人格问卷-Ⅱ对2078名应征青年、2016名新兵和1368名列兵进行计算机检测,并对1052名新兵计算机检测42d后进行重复测验;对1372名列兵进行纸笔测验。结果 计算机检测组和纸笔测验组的结果除掩饰性[T（8.82±3.26）分、（9.26±3.14）分]和冲动特质[Imt（14.08±3.75）分、（15.26±3.61）分]外,其他量表均无显著差异。应征青年组与新兵组间比较,除求异性[S（8.00±5.61）分、（7.33±5.05）分]和分离特质[Dit（16.55±9.67）分、（15.29±9.47）分]外,其他各量表无显著差异;除冲动特质（Imt）外,应征青年组与列兵组间各量表均有显著差异;除掩饰性（T）外,新兵组其他各量表均与列兵组有显著差异。重复测验各量表除敏感特制（Set）和冲动特质（Imt）外,其他均有显著差异;重测信度为0.52～0.74。结论 CSPQ-Ⅱ应用在征兵体检中并采用计算机检测效果较好,本测验重测信度较高。

Objective To explore development of chinese soldier personality questionnaire-Ⅱ （CSPQ-Ⅱ）. Methods 2078 candidates, 2016 recruits and 2740 private soldiers were tested by CSPQ-Ⅱ. And 1052 recruits were retested in 42 clays after the computerized-test of CSPQ-II. Results Scores of tests by computer and pencilpaper had no significant differences except Truth-concealing scale （T：8.82± 3. 26,9.26 ± 3.14） and Impulsive Trait scale （ Imt： 14.08 ± 3. 75,15.26 ± 3. 61 ）. There were no significant differences between candidates and recruits except Difference-seeking scale （ S ： 8. 00 ± 5.61,7. 33 ± 5.05 ） and Dissociative scale （ Dit ： 16. 55 ± 9. 67, 15.29 ± 9. 47 ）, Scores of candidates and recruits were significantly different from private soldiers except Impulsive Trait scale （Imt） in candidates and Truth-concealing scale （T） in recruits, Scores of retesting of recruits had significant differences except Sensitive scale （Set） and Impulsive Trait scale （Imt）. Test-retest reliabilities were 0.52 - 0.74, Conclusion Computerized-test of CSPQ-Ⅱ should be taken in the time of physical examination for enlist, It has a good stability and reliability.