期刊文献+

体外冲击波碎石治疗效果影响因素分析 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 回顾体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗尿石症患者316例的临床资料,分析性别、年龄、结石大小、位置、合并肾积水等因素与ESWL治疗效果的影响。结果男性碎石成功率为79.4%,女性为81.2%;碎石成功者年龄(43±10.68)岁,失败者(59±14.98)岁,肾结石碎石成功率为85.5%,输尿管结石为78.1%。输尿管上、中、下的成功率分别为85.2%、70.6%、71.6%;结石直径0.3~1.0cm、1.1~2.0cm、2.0cm以上的成功率分别为97.5%、71.68%、37.2%;伴轻中度肾积水与重度肾积水的成功率分别为81.8%、45.8%。认为不同年龄、不同结石位置、不同结石大小、合并肾积水不同程度之间碎石成功率均有统计学意义。
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第22期60-61,共2页 Shandong Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献8

  • 1梁丽莉,郭应禄,汤慧娣,石声华.ESWL 治疗输尿管结石失败原因分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1997,18(5):273-274. 被引量:200
  • 2杨秀书,第五次全国泌尿外科学术会议论文汇编,1996年
  • 3郭应禄,腔内泌尿外科学,1995年,442页
  • 4郭应禄,中华泌尿外科杂志,1989年,10卷,193页
  • 5Singh I, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, et al. Impact of power index,hydroureteronephrosis,stone size and composition on the efficacy of in situ boosted ESWL for primary proximal ureteral calculi. Urology,2001,58:16-22.
  • 6Jonathan M, Flalkov SPH, Bernard F,et al. Reassessing the efficacy of the Dornier MFL-5000 lithotriptor. J Urol,2000 ,164 :640-643.
  • 7Eterovic D, Juretic KL, Capkun V, et al. Pyelolithotomy improves while extracorporeal lithotripsy impairs kidney function. J Urol, 1999,161:39-44.
  • 8Grenabo L,Lindqvist K, Adami HO, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of renal stones. Treatment policy is as important for success as type of lithotriptor and patient selection. Arch Surg, 1997,132:20-26.

共引文献248

同被引文献21

  • 1杨卫民,许哲,李沙林,张克斌,李星洪,李光昭.B超定位ESWL治疗输尿管中段结石204例[J].广东医学,2004,25(8):955-956. 被引量:11
  • 2Harewood LM, Webb DR, Pope AJ, et al. Laparoseopie ureterolithtomy the result of an initial series, and aevaluation of its role in the management of uretericcalculi [J]. Br J Urol, 1994,74(2) :170- 176.
  • 3Tiselius HG.How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy withmodem lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones[J].J Endour,2011,22 ( 3 ):249-255.
  • 4White W, Klein F.Five-year clinical experience with the Domier Deltalithotriptor[J].Urofoly,2009,68 ( 11 ): 28-32.
  • 5Suzuki K,Yamashita Y, Yoshida M, et al.A single center experience with alithotripsy machine modulith SLX-F2 : evalnation of dual focus system andclinical results[J].HinyokikaKiyo,2010,56 (10): 81-86.
  • 6Egilmez T, Tekin MI,Conen M,et al.E?Gcacy and safety of a new-generationshockwave lithotripsy machine in the treatment of single renal or ureteralstones : experience with 2670 patientsfj] J Endour, 2009,21 (6): 23-27.
  • 7Kramolowsky EV,Wang G, Butler RM, et al.Clinical and economic impactof implementation of slow shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of urinarycalculi[J]JEndour,2010,24 (7): 1483-1486.
  • 8Delakas D, Karyotis I,Daskalopoulos G, et al.Independent predictorsof failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a secondgeneration lithotripter[J]. J Endour,2009,17 ( 10 ) : 201-205.
  • 9Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Panagopoulos G, et al.Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy success based on body massindex and Hounsfield units[J].Urofogy,2005,65 ( 32) : 33-36.
  • 10Griffin SJ, Margaryan M, Archambaud F.Safety of shock wave lithotripsyfor treatment of pediatric urolithiasis : 20-year experience[J].The JournalofUrology,2010,183 (6): 2332-2336.

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部