期刊文献+

腹腔镜在诊断不明的外科急腹症中的应用54例分析 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜技术对术前诊断不明的外科急腹症诊断与治疗价值。方法:对54例术前未能明确诊断的急腹症患者采取腹腔镜探查,进行诊断并予以治疗。结果:54例均得到明确诊断并得到及时治疗。结论:对诊断不明的外科急腹症进行腹腔镜探查是一种行之有效的方法,可减少阴性和非治疗性剖腹探查。
出处 《中国误诊学杂志》 CAS 2007年第20期4931-4932,共2页 Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献11

  • 1[1]Chiarugi M, Buccianti P, Celona G, et al. Laparoscopic compared with open appendicectomy for acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Eur J Surg, 1996, 162: 385-390.
  • 2[2]Martin LC, Puente I, et al. Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg, 1995, 222: 256-262.
  • 3[3]Apelgren KN, Moloar RG, Kisala JM. Laparoscopic is not better than open appendectomy. Am Surg, 1995, 61: 240-243.
  • 4[4]Henle KP,Beller S,Rechner J,et al. A Laparoscopic versus konventionelle Appendektomie: Eine prospective, randomisierteStudie. Chirurg, 1996, 67: 526-530.
  • 5[5]Pier A, Gotz F, Bacher C. Laparoscopic appendectomy in 625 cases: from innovation to routine. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991, 1: 8-13.
  • 6[6]Williams MD, Collins JN, Wright TF, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. South Med J, 1996, 89: 668-674.
  • 7[7]Kum CK,Ngoi SS,gob PMY,et al. Randomized controlled rtial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy. Br JSurg, 1993, 80: 1599-1600.
  • 8[8]Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, et al. the Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study GROUP. A prospective, randomized eomparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg, 1995, 196: 208-213.
  • 9[9]Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial.World J Surg, 1996, 20: 17-21.
  • 10[10]Hale DA, molloy M, Pearl RH, et al. Apendectomy: a contemporary appraisal. Ann Surg, 1997, 225: 252-261.

共引文献11

同被引文献7

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部