期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

影响教师将信息技术整合于数学教学的因素分析 被引量：13

Analysis of Factors Affecting Teachers’ Integration of ICT in Mathematics Instruction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 影响信息技术与数学教学整合的相关因素有内在因素——教师的知识经验、内在促动因素和外在因素——软硬件设备、教学资源、学校管理等.因素模型能够较好地解释影响中小学数学教师整合层次的因素关系;在影响教师整合层次的因素模型中,外在环境因素扮演着影响教师知识经验和内在促动发挥的重要平台.个体内在因素与环境因素的和谐互动是影响教师整合层次的重要根源. Based on survey and structural equation model analysis, this study probed into the factors and its＇ path affecting teachers＇ integration of ICT into mathematics instruction, and found： （1） The fitness between model hypothesis and data was approximately good; （2） Extrinsic environment factor was an important platform that sustains higher-level integration; （3） Individual factors （intrinsic） had have the most significant effect on higher-level integration.
作者 文玉婵 周莹
机构地区 玉林师范学院数学与计算机科学系 广西师范大学数学科学学院
出处 《数学教育学报》 北大核心 2007年第3期44-48,共5页 Journal of Mathematics Education
基金 新世纪广西高等教育教学改革工程"十一五"项目:基础教育新课改与高师数学教育系列课程的整合 教育部广西师范大学基础教育课程研究中心项目(GNUJ200301)
关键词 信息技术与数学教学整合 因素 整合层次 integration of ICT into mathematics instruction factors level of integration
分类号 G442 [哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Cuban L,Kirkpatrick H,Peck C.High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms:Explaining an Apparent Paradox[J].American Educational Research Journal,2001,38(4):813-834.
  • 2Bauer J,Kenton J.Toward Technology Integration in the Schools:Why It Isn't Happening[J].Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,2005,3(4):519-546.
  • 3Roblyer M D.Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching (3rd edition)[M].Columbus,OH:Merrill Prentice Hall,2003.
  • 4Pelgrum W.Obstacles to the Integration of ICT in Education:Results from a Worldwide Educational Assessment[J].Computers and Education,2001,37:163-178.
  • 5Whitehead A R.Self-efficacy and Context Beliefs of Teachers Regarding Technology:Relationship of Those Beliefs to Technology Use in the Classroom[D].Mary Wood University,2002.
  • 6Gifford B L.Teacher Beliefs,Learning Styles,and Technology Implementation in Rural,Secondary Classrooms in Massauchusetts[D].Johnson and Wales University,2004.
  • 7Ertmer P A.Teacher Pedagogical Beliefs:The Final Frontier in Our Quest for Technology Integration? Educational Technology Research and Development,2005,53(4):25-39.
  • 8Hughes J.The Role of Teacher Knowledge and Learning Experiences in Forming Technology-integrated Pedagogy[J].Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,2005,13(2):277-302.
  • 9Gutierrez A Boero.Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education:Past,Present and Future[M].Sense Publishers,2006.
  • 10宋耀廷 张国恩 侯惠泽.信息科技融入教学:借镜美国经验,反思台湾发展[J].教育研究集刊,2005,51(1):31-62.

二级参考文献30

  • 1[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1～10
  • 2[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 3[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588～ 606
  • 4[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238～ 246
  • 5[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247～ 255
  • 6[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315～ 353
  • 7[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136～ 162
  • 8[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993
  • 9[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424～ 453
  • 10[10]Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1～ 55

共引文献1281

同被引文献148

引证文献13

二级引证文献74

数学教育学报
2007年 第3期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部