摘要
目的:比较奥氮平与维思通治疗脑血管病精神障碍的疗效及副作用。方法:采用BPRS及TESS评定,观察4周。结果:奥氮平有效率为90%,维思通有效率88.2%,两者无显著差异,但奥氮平镇静作用强,维思通EPS多。结论:奥氮平与维思通的疗效相当,奥氮平镇静作用强,维思通EPS多。
Objective: To conapare efficacy and side effect of Risperdal and Ohnzapin in mental disorders due to crebral vascular discase.Methods:To assess by the BPRS and TESS, Two gcoups were observed for 4 weeks. Results: There was no significant difference between two groups, but there was EPS in Pdsperdal's group. Sedative in Olanzapine' s group. Conclusin: Efficacy was the same between two groups, but there was Eps enough in Risperdal' s group and sedative enough in Olanzapine's group.
出处
《中国民康医学》
2007年第16期635-635,640,共2页
Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词
奥氮平
维思通
脑血管病
精神障碍
Olanzapine
Rispeldal
Cerebral vascular
Mental disorder