期刊文献+

论“确认悖论”

On the Paradoxes of Confirmation
原文传递
导出
摘要 Confirmation theory is the basic one of empirical science.However,the paradoxes of confirmation arising within greatly diminish the stability of science itself.The efforts of philosophers,for many years,to resolve the paradoxes,have not yet gained satisfactory results;so far it is still an open question.Based on the works of senior philosophers,this paper,in terms of deeply analysis of the related literature of science and logic,proposes independently and argues for systematically a solution to the paradoxes of confirmation. Confirmation theory is the basic one of empirical science.However,the paradoxes of confirmation arising within greatly diminish the stability of science itself.The efforts of philosophers,for many years,to resolve the paradoxes,have not yet gained satisfactory results;so far it is still an open question.Based on the works of senior philosophers,this paper,in terms of deeply analysis of the related literature of science and logic,proposes independently and argues for systematically a solution to the paradoxes of confirmation.
作者 王军风
机构地区 武汉大学出版社
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第8期86-91,共6页 Philosophical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1克莱因,1984年.《古今数学思想》第4册,上海科学技术出版社.
  • 2赖特,2003年.《确证悖论》,载《知识之树》,三联书店.
  • 3斯劳特,2006年.《确证悖论》,载牛顿一史密斯主编.《科学哲学指南》,上海科技教育出版社.
  • 4Hempel, C. G. , 1965, "Studies in the logic of confirmation", in Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York: The Free Press.
  • 5Rescher, N. , 2001, Paradoxes-Their Roots, Range, and Resolution, Chicago: Open Court.
  • 6Sainsbury, R. M. , 1995, Paradoxes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部