摘要
背景:个性特质对学生未来生涯规划及发展影响极大,针对医学生进行相关的调查研究,是医学院教育的工作重点之一。研究设计:本研究根据BigFive五大人格特质模式设计出相关的调查问卷,针对124位医学系在学学生进行自我评估调查性研究。并作专家效度及内容一致信度的评估。结果:在五大面向44个问题分析的结果,其内部一致性信度自0.484￣0.792不等。而题目经过筛选删除(从44题删为34题后)后,其一致性信度提高至0.67￣0.82,相当具有一致性。但不可避免的其鉴别度也会因此稍有下降(标准差从4.6￣4.9降至3.8￣4.6)。在以面向作单位的专家效度评估方面,其效度系数自0.8￣0.9不等,均有达到5-scale,五评估者统计上0.05显著程度。结论:本研究将医学生的个性特质以Big-Five五大面向自评的方式得到相关的数据。从内在一致性信度与内容效度分析可作适当的筛检。由数据与过去文献显示该问卷效度极佳,信度在经过这次初探性的研究显示除少数问题外,大致而言各面向内部一致性信度良好。未来从事更大规模的调查性研究时,应可将修正后的量表作为工具,同时也可进一步证实其可靠性。
Background：Personality characters will influence the future career planning and development of medical students. Therefore, it will be important in the field of medical education to survey their personalities. Study design：The personality questionnaire was developed according to the Big-Five characters. The content validity and consistent reliability were assessed. A total of 124 undergraduate medical students participated in this 44-item self-evaluation about their personalities. Results：The inter-item consistency reliabilities of the 44-items of Big-Five personality questionnaire were analyzed and discordant items were deleted （Crobach＇s Alpha from 0.484-0.782 before selection to 0.67-0.82 after selection）. The content validity of this five dimensions ranged from 0.8 to 0.9（P〈0.05）. Conclusion：Through this priliminary investigation we get the Big-Five self evaluation of the medical students. Deletion of some items of this questionnaire can improve the consistency reliability. In the future we can modify our questionnaire and get more information from subsequent studies.
出处
《医学教育探索》
2007年第9期863-866,873,共5页
Researches in Medical Education
关键词
五大人格特质
信效度分析
医学教育
Big-Five personality
Reliability and validity analysis
Medical education.
