期刊文献+

头孢地嗪对新生儿败血症的临床疗效评价 被引量:4

Clinical study on curative effect of cefodizime for neonatal septicemia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价头孢地嗪(CDZ)对新生儿败血症的临床疗效。方法采用临床病例对照观察研究方法,把112例新生儿败血症患儿随机分为CDZ组(43例)和对照(CG)组,CDZ组抗生素首选CDZ50mg·kg-1·d-1,q12h;CG组随机选用其他β-内酰胺类药物,选用复方抗生素者为CG1组(33例),选用单方者为CG2组(36例)。统计分析首选抗生素5d内换药率及各组间预后的差异。结果112例患儿首选抗生素共6种,5d内换药率CDZ组为12%,其他5种抗生素为36%~66%,首选抗生素的换药率和最终治疗的有效率呈负相关(r=-0.888,P<0.05)。三组有效率比较差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。结论CDZ临床疗效好,可作为治疗新生儿败血症的新选择。 Objective To investigate the clinical effects of cefodizime (CDZ) on neonatal septicemia. Methods The cases of 112 neonates with septicemia were divided into 3 groups at random . The CDZ group with 43 cases received 50 mg/kg CDZ, q 12h. The control group (CG) received other β - lactam antibiotics at random, compound antibiotics for the CG1 with 33 cases and simple antibiotics for the CG2 with 36 cases. The changing ratio in 5 days of first choice antibiotics and the prognosis of 3 groups were analyzed. Results There were 6 antibiotics as the first choice in the 112 cases. The changing ratio in 5 days was 12% for CDZ group, and the others were 36% - 66%. The prognosis of neonatal septicemia had negative correlation with the antibiotics changing ratio in 5 days ( r = - 0. 888, P 〈 0. 05 ). There were statistical significance in the effective rates among the CDZ group ( 93% ) , CG1 group ( 73% ) and CG2 group(60% ) , all P 〈 0.05. Conclusion The C DZ has good clinical efficacy , and can be used as a new antibacterial choice for neonatal septicemia.
出处 《中国急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第8期698-701,共4页 Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
基金 河南省教育厅自然科学研究科技攻关资助项目(No2007350007)
关键词 新生儿 败血症 头孢地嗪 抗生素 预后 Neonates Septicemia Cefodizime Antibiotics Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1胡劲涛,谢宗德,陈平洋,贺晓日,王涛,薄涛.新生儿肺炎克雷伯菌败血症临床分析[J].中国急救医学,2007,27(1):27-29. 被引量:11
  • 2徐灵敏,张展,贾莉婷,王军,栾斌.新生儿败血症心肌损害相关因素的临床研究[J].中国急救医学,2007,27(1):24-26. 被引量:6
  • 3徐灵敏,张展,栾斌.头孢地嗪双重作用的基础和临床研究[J].儿科药学杂志,2007,13(1):65-66. 被引量:12
  • 4中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组,余加林,吴仕孝.新生儿败血症诊疗方案[J].中华儿科杂志,2003,41(12):897-899. 被引量:1026
  • 5洪洲,翁心华.袖珍抗感染用药手册[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2001:79-80.
  • 6Hamilton-Miller JM.Immunopharmacology of antibiotics:direct and indirect immunomodulation of defence mechanisms[J].J Chemother,2001,13(2):107 -111.
  • 7Song H,Li G,Ye J,et al.Immunomodulating effects of cefodizime on Klebsiella pneumoniae-stimulated neutrophils[J].Immunobiology,2004,209(3):277-282.
  • 8Zanussi C,Cocuzza G.Open,controlled,randomized study on the efficacy and safety of cefodizime single daily dose versus two daily doses and versus ceftriaxone single daily dose in patients with acute purulent bronchitis and acute purulent exacerbation of chronic bronchitis[J].J Chemother,1995,7(6):535 -542.
  • 9Lnfant B,Namour F,Logeais C,et al.Pharmacokinetics of cefodizime following single doses of 0.5,1.0,2.0,and 3.0 grams adninistered intravenously to healthy volunteers[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1995,39(9):2037-2041.
  • 10余加林,吴仕孝,贾慧群,母灿荣,范永萃.新生儿感染病原菌及药敏试验12年总结[J].中华儿科杂志,2001,39(6):354-357. 被引量:42

二级参考文献46

共引文献1106

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部