期刊文献+

专利保护程度评价体系与中美保护程度比较 被引量:17

Study on patent protection degree evaluation system and comparison of patent protection degree between china and U.S.A
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从专利保护过程出发构建专利保护程度评价体系,分析我国专利保护的演进态势,比较中美专利保护的主要指标,并基于世界最大指标,利用专利保护程度计算公式得出我国1985-2004年和美国2004年的专利保护程度,指出要提高专利保护程度,我国应大力提高专利司法保护程度,并稳步提高专利审批保护和行政执法保护程度的结论。 The article constructs a patent protection degree evaluation system from the procedure of patent protection, and evaluates the patent protection degree of China from 1985 - 2004 and that in 2004 of U. S. A . It shows that the patent legislation protection degree was relatively high and went in advance, and it reached to the strongest protection degree nearly in the world. The patent protection degree of examination and administration ascended in a fluctuation. The protection degree of justice rose before 2000 and descended afterward. The social protection degree increased evidently. From 1985 to 2004, China had made a great progress in patent protection, the patent protection degree in 2004 reached 74.52% and it was near to the patent protection degree of 87.24% in U. S. A. U. S. A was not the most country of patent protection degree in the world. At present, if China wants to heighten the patent protection degree, it is necessary to heighten the patent justice protection degree greatly, and it is also necessary to heighten the patent examination and administration protection degree in a steady way.
作者 宋河发
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期646-653,共8页 Studies in Science of Science
关键词 专利 专利保护程度 评价体系 比较 patent patent protection degree evaluation system comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Idris K.Wipo Intellectual Property Handbook:Policy,Law and Use[C].Geneva:WIPO publication No.489 (E).2001.
  • 2郑成思.知识产权法教程[M].北京:法律出版社,1993..
  • 3Gilbert R,Shapiro C.Optimal patent length and breadth[J].RAND Journal of Economics,1990,(21):106-112.
  • 4寇宗来.专利保护宽度和累积创新竞赛中的信息披露[J].经济学(季刊),2004,3(3):743-762. 被引量:10
  • 5Rapp R T,Rozck R P.Benefits and costs of intellectual property protection in developing countries[J].Journal of world trade,1990,24(5):76-102.
  • 6Ginarte J C,Park W G.Determinants of patent rights:A cross-national study[J].Research Policy,1997,26(3):283-301.
  • 7韩玉雄,李怀祖.关于中国知识产权保护水平的定量分析[J].科学学研究,2005,23(3):377-382. 被引量:377
  • 8国家知识产权局条法司.中华人民共和国专利法[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2002.
  • 9Summary of Patent Examining Activities[R].http://Www.Uspto.Gov /web/offices/com /annual/2005/060401_table1.html.
  • 10www.uspto.gov.

二级参考文献46

  • 1曲三强.被动立法的百年轮迴——谈中国知识产权保护的发展历程[J].中外法学,1999,11(2):119-122. 被引量:65
  • 2Grossman, G. and C. Shapiro, "Dynamic R&D Competition", Economic Journal, 1987, 97, 372-387.
  • 3Horowitz, A. and E. Lai, "Patent Length and Rate of Innovation", International Economic Review,1996, 37, 785-601.
  • 4Klemperer, P., "How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection be?" RAND Journal of Economics,1990, 21, 113-130.
  • 5Lanjouw, J. and M. Shankerman, "Characteristics of Patent Litigation: A Window on Competition",RAND Journal of Economics, 2001, 32, 129-151.
  • 6Lee, T. and L. Wilde, "Market Structure and Innovation: A Reformulation", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1980, 94, 429-436.
  • 7Loury, G., "Market Structure and Innovation", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1979, 93, 395-410.
  • 8Machlup, F. and E. Penrose, "The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century", Journal of Economic History, 1950, 10, 1-29.
  • 9Merges, R. and R. Nelson, "On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope", Columbia law Review,1990, 90, 839-916.
  • 10O'Donoghue, T., "A Patentability Requirement for Sequential Innovation", RAND Journal of Economics, 1998, 29, 654-667.

共引文献441

同被引文献241

引证文献17

二级引证文献247

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部