期刊文献+

不同处理剂对猪场废水污染物去除效果比较研究 被引量:3

Application of Different Chemical Precipitation for Piggery Wastewater Treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 比较了不同处理药剂对猪场废水净化效果,实验表明:化学沉淀法能够较好地去除猪场废水中有机物、磷、重金属、盐分,对氮的去除效果并不理想。投加量为1g.L-1的FeC l3、聚合硫酸铁、聚合氯化铝、明矾在猪场废水中有较好的絮凝效果,对总磷、悬浮物、CODCr、Cu离子均有很好的去除效果,MgSO4、Mg(OH)2对废水中溶解性总磷也实现了很好的去除效果,氯化钙、硫酸镁、硅土、聚合硫酸铁对废水中Zn有很好的去除效果,而明矾对Zn的去除效果与对Cu的去除效果相反。 Several series of experiments were conducted to investigate the treatment of piggery wastewater using chemical precipitation (CP). Throughout the experiments, CP was found to achieve high removal efficiencies for organic compounds, phosphorus, heavy metals and salinity from the piggery wastewater, which was not ideal for nitrogen. Experimental results showed the doses of FeCl3, Fe2 (SO4) 3, AlCl3, Alum was 1 g/l, which has a high removal efficiencies for TP, SS, CODcr and Cu, CaCl2, MgSO4, silica, Fe2 (SO4) 3, also for Zn. The CP was a low cost and simple treatment which was important for piggery wastewater treatment. If integrated biological removal nitrogen, the CP could have better removal efficiencies for the piggery wastewater.
出处 《环境科学导刊》 2007年第4期41-44,共4页 Environmental Science Survey
关键词 猪场废水 处理剂 处理效果 比较 piggery wastewater treatment precipitation treatment efficient comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1许振成,谢武明,谌建宇,彭晓春.养猪场废水治理技术进展[J].中国沼气,2004,22(2):26-29. 被引量:12
  • 2龚丽雯,龚敏红,王成云,陈建湘,李京会.微电解/接触氧化/稳定塘处理猪场废水[J].中国给水排水,2003,19(8):92-94. 被引量:14
  • 3[3]O.S.Amuda,A.Alade.Coagulation/flocculation process in the treatment of abattoir wastewater[J].Desalination.2006,196.
  • 4[5]Lee SH,Iamchaturapatr J,Polprasert C,Ahn KH.Application of chemical precipitation for piggery wastewater treatment[J].Water Sci Technol.2004;49(5-6).
  • 5国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法(第四版).北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
  • 6[7]James D.Doyle,Simon A.Parsons.Struvite formation,control and recovery[J].Water Research,2002,36.

二级参考文献28

  • 1Robert L, et al. Constructed wetlands for livestock wastewater management[J]. Ecological Engineering,2000,15:41-55.
  • 2M E Poach, et al,Improved nitrogen treatment by constructed wetlands receiving partially nitrified liquid swine manure[J]. Ecological Engineering,2003,20:183-/197.
  • 3James A Entry, et al.Polyacrylamide preparations for protection of water quality threatened by agricultural runoff contaminants [J]. Environmental Pollution,2002,120:191-200.
  • 4Julie K Cronk. Constructed wetlands to treat wastewater from dairy and swine operations: a review[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystem and Environment,1996,58:97-114.
  • 5Jiayang Cheng, et al, Nutrient recovery from swine lagoon water by Spirodela punctata[J]. Bioresource Technology,2002,81:81-85.
  • 6P Y Yang, et al. An on-farm swine waste management system in Hawaii[J]. Bioresource Technology,1998,65:21-27.
  • 7D Obaja, et al. Nitrification,denitrification and biological phosphorus removal in piggery wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor[J]. Bioresource Technology,2003,87:103-111.
  • 8Sang-Ill Lee, et al. Effect of fermented swine wastes on biological nutrient removal in sequencing batch reactors [J]. Wat. Res. 1997,31(7)::1802-1812.
  • 9N Bernet, et al. Combined anaerobic-aerobic SBR for the treatment of piggery wastewater [J]. Wat Res, 2000,34(2):611-619.
  • 10C S Ra, et al. Biological nutrient removal with an internal organic carbon source in piggery wastewater treatment[J].Wat Res 2000,34(3)::965-973.

共引文献81

同被引文献56

引证文献3

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部