期刊文献+

380例次长期深静脉留置导管临床应用的生存分析 被引量:18

Survival analysis of indwelling venous catheters for permanent use in hemodialysis patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的提高对长期静脉留职导管的置管、使用、护理的认识,延长其使用寿命。方法随访本院血液净化中心患者380例次深静脉置管并长期留置的情况和并发症,记录导管使用终点。应用Kaplan-Meier法绘制导管使用寿命的生存曲线,计算中位生存时间。log-rank检验比较导管使用寿命的差异。分析评价置管方法、感染发生率、导管退出原因及透析充分性。结果导管静脉入路途径包括颈内、颈外、锁骨下及股静脉。3种静脉入路中位生存时间分别为颈内(31.0±2.8)月,颈外(30.0±4.0)月,锁骨下(19.0±2.9)月。log-rank生存曲线检验结果显示,颈内与锁骨下进路比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。导管使用终点113例次,其中患者死亡60例(53.1%),感染14例(12.4%),导管功能不良13例(11.5%),肾移植13例(11.5%),内瘘2例(1.8%),导管意外拉脱7例(6.2%),导管破损4例(3.5%)。导管内感染61例次,隧道感染2例次。结论长期留置导管首选颈内静脉入路,其次为颈外静脉入路。导管终点以患者死亡、感染及导管功能不良占绝大多数。 Objective To improve the cognition of long-term indwelling venous catheter in placement, management and nursing, and to prolong the use of catheter. Methods General status and complications of 380 long-term indwelling venous cuffed catheters in 355 maintenance hemodialysis patients were followed up. The reasons of ending or survival of catheters, as well as the catheter placement, infection incidence, dialysis adequacy were analyzed and evaluated retrospectively. Survival curve was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. Median lifetime of the catheters was calculated. Usage difference was examined with log-rank test. Results Cuffed catheters for long-term blood access were implanted in 355 cases of chronic renal failure patients, with a total of 380 implantation including 25 re-implantation. Internal jugular vein was used for the site of catheter implantation in 304 attempts, external jugular vein in 35 and subclavian vein in 40. The mean survival time of the catheter was (32.36±2.16) months (95% CI of 28.1-36.6) and the median survival time (31.0±2.3) months (95% CI of 26.5-35.5). Median survival time of catheter locating in internal jugular vein, external jugular vein and subclavian vein was (31.0±2.8), (30.0± 4.0) and (19.0±2.9) months respectively. The survival time of catheter locating in internal jugular vein was significantly longer as compared with that in subclavian vein by Kaplan-Meier (χ^2=4.257, P=0.039). Ending of catheter usage was observed in 113 catheters including death of 60 cases (53.1%), infection of 14 cases (12.4%), successful renal transplantation of 13 cases (11.5%),dysfunction of 13 cases (11.5%), pull-out of 6 cases (6.2%), catheter damage of 4 cases (3.5%) and fistula mature of 2 cases (1.8%). Sixty-three catheter-related infections occurred, among them 21 catheters were removed. No significant difference of dialysis adequacy was found between catheter and fistula group. Conclusions The first choice of long-term indwelling catheter position is internal jugular vein. Main causes of the ending of catheter are death, infection and dysfunction.
出处 《中华肾脏病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第8期492-496,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nephrology
关键词 血液透析 导管 留置 涤纶环双腔导管 生存分析 Hemodialysis Catheter, indwelling Cuffed catheter Survival analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Tanriover B, Carlton D, Saddekni S. et al. Baeteremia associated with tunneled dialysis catheters:comparison of two treatment strategies. Kidney Int, 2000, 57:2151-2155
  • 2Skandalos I, Amvrosiadis D, Filippidis A, et al.Insertion of long-term tunneled cuffed hemodialysis catheters via the external jugular vein by using a simple, safe and reliable surgical technique. J Vasc Access, 2007, 8:12-16.
  • 3Develter W, De Cubber A, Van Biesen W, et al. Survival and complications of indwelling venous catheters for permanent use in hemodialysis patients. Artif Organs,2005, 29: 399-405.
  • 4Zellweger M, Bouchard J, Raymond-Carrier S, et al.Systemic anticoagulation and prevention of hemodialysis catheter malfunction. ASAIO J, 2005, 51:360-365.
  • 5叶朝阳,付文成,戎殳,陈静,马晓红,张斌,梅长林.长期深静脉留置双腔导管血液透析的临床应用[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2004,13(3):231-234. 被引量:122
  • 6张萍,袁静,陈江华,吴建永,张晓辉,蒋华.111例长期深静脉留置透析导管患者相关并发症的分析[J].中华内科杂志,2004,43(3):198-200. 被引量:64
  • 7Saxena AK, Panhotra BR, Sundaram DS, et al. Tunneled catheters'outcome optimization among diabetics on dialysis through antibiotic-lock placement. Kidney Int, 2006, 70: 1629-1635.

二级参考文献17

  • 1陈江华 朱琮 叶有新 等.血透患者中心静脉留置透析导管的感染并发症及原因探讨[J].透析与人工器官,1991,2:2-7.
  • 2Jean G, Charra B, Chazot C, et al. Long-term outcome of permanent hemodialysis catheters: a controlled study. Blood Purif, 2001,19(4):401
  • 3Marr K, Krekland K, Seefon D, et al. Catheter related bacteremia in hemodialysis patients. Ann Intern Med, 1997,127: 275
  • 4Shaffer D. Catheter-related sepsis complicating long-term, tunnelled central venous dialysis catheter: Management by guide-wire exchange. AJKD,1995,25: 593
  • 5Kumwenda MJ, Wright FK, Haybittle KJ. Survey of permanent central venous catheters for haemodialysis in the UK. Nephrol Dial Transplant,1996,11 (5) :830
  • 6Kailash K, Jindal C, Jean H, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. AJKD, 1999,10: S287
  • 7Jean G, Charra B, Chazot C, et al. Long-term ourcome of permanent hemodialysis catheters: a controlled study. Blood Purif,2001,19(4) :401
  • 8Szabo J, Locking-Cusolito H, et al. The impact of increased blood flow rates on recirculation in central venous hemodialysis catheters. Nephrol Nurs J ,2001,28(6) :639
  • 9Di Iorio B, Lopez T, Procida M, et al. Successful use of central venous catheter as permanent hemodialysis access: 84-month follow-Up in lucania. Blood Purif,2001,19(1) :39
  • 10Hassan HA, Frenchie DL, Bastani B. Effect of reversal of catheter ports on recirculation: comparison of the PermCath with Tesio Twin Catheter.ASAIO J,2002,48(3) :316

共引文献175

同被引文献136

引证文献18

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部