期刊文献+

唐代江州陈氏东佳书堂的性质问题刍议 被引量:5

Discussion on the Nature of Jiangzhou Chen's Dongjia Learning House in the Tang Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 具有教学功能的书院始于唐。书院不是国家规定的一种教育制度,而是民间人士自发创造的学校教育模式,书院的名称也因此极不固定,"书院"和"书堂"("书舍"、"书斋"等)存在着互用、通用的情况。徐梓先生在《元代书院研究》中认为唐代的东佳书堂已有书院之实,但尚无书院之名,从而否定了作为教学机构的书院起源于唐代的观点。从"书院"和"书堂"("书舍"、"书斋"等)名称的互用、通用来看,这一说法难以成立。 Ancient academies of classical learning with the function of education firstly appeared in the Tang Dynasty. They were not incoporated into the official education system; on the contrary, they were non-governmentally supported and financed. Therefore, they had different kinds of name, and sometimes "learning house" was their substitute. Mr. Xuzi pointed out in his History of Academies of Classical Learning in the Yuan Dynasty that although the Dongjia Learning House already had the real function of academy of classical learning, it didn't have its real name of academy accordingly, and thus he denied the viewpoint that ancient academies originated from the Tang Dynasty. However, the fact that the names of "academy" and "learning house" are interchangeable proves that Mr. Xuzi's viewpoint is short of the historical basis.
作者 张劲松
出处 《南京晓庄学院学报》 2007年第4期96-99,共4页 Journal of Nanjing Xiaozhuang University
基金 江西省教育厅高校人文社科规划项目(2005):基于教育视角的赣文化精神研究
关键词 东佳书堂 书院 起源 性质 唐代 《元代书院研究》 the Dongjia Learning House academy of classical learning origin nature the Tang Dynasty History of Academies of Classical Learning in the Yuan Dynasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1毛礼锐.《中国古代教育史》[M].人民教育出版社,1979.358,394.
  • 2(美国)黄仁宇.万历十五年[M].北京:三联书店出版社,1997.
  • 3(北宋)范仲淹.范文正公集:附录[M].国学基本丛书[M].上海:商务印书馆,1937.
  • 4杨亿.《武夷新集》卷六(四库全书本).
  • 5孙彦明.《宋代书院制度研究》,1963年,政大教研所硕士论文.
  • 6《中国教育简史》,1984年,教育科学出版社.
  • 7(北宋)韩琦.韩魏公集:家传[M].国学基本丛书[M].上海:商务印书馆,1937.
  • 8www.jx.xinhuanet.com.cn[DB/OL].2004-03-15.
  • 9(南宋)幸元龙.桂岩书院记[A].江西通志:卷八十一[M].清光绪七年刊本.
  • 10阮志高.江州陈氏东佳书堂研究(内部资料)[M].南昌:江西教育学院书院史研究室,1989.

共引文献1

同被引文献68

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部