期刊文献+

平板和框架板无砟轨道结构力学分析 被引量:8

Mechanical Analysis of Structures of Plane Slab and Frame Slab for Ballastless Track
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究目的:平板和框架板无砟轨道是板式无砟轨道的2种基本型式,研究它们在荷载作用下力学响应的差异,为设计、施工提供参考。研究方法:采用有限元理论,建立了平板和框架板无砟轨道的梁-板模型,应用大型有限元工具软件ansys对模型进行求解。研究结果:选用相同的参数进行计算,得出了平板和框架板无砟轨道结构各部分受力的差别,以及荷载作用位置对板式无砟轨道结构受力的影响规律。研究结论:(1)在相同的荷载作用下,框架板无砟轨道除底座纵向正弯矩较平板无砟轨道较小外,轨道板纵横向弯矩、底座纵向负弯矩、底座横向弯矩、CA砂浆调整层反力均较大。(2)仅从轨道结构受力来看,框架板跟平板差异不显著,但由于框架板具有良好的经济性,改善施工性能等优点,在国内具有很大的发展前景。(3)荷载作用位置对无砟轨道结构各部分受力影响很显著,荷载作用于板中和板端为2种最不利作用情况,在无砟轨道结构设计中,应该综合这2种荷载作用方式下的较大值进行设计。 Research purposes: Plane slab and frame slab ballastless tracks are two basic kinds of slab ballastless track. The mechanical differences between these two ballastless track structures acted by loads are studied and references can be offered to design and construction. Research methods: Using finite element theory, beam - slab models of plane slab and frame slab ballastless tracks are built, the model calculation is caught by the finite element tool software ANSYS. Research results:Same parameters are adopted to make the mechanical results out, the mechanical distinctness between plane slab and frame slab ballastless track structures is obtained, the effects on slab track conduced because different action position by loads is researched, too. Research conclusions: ( 1 ) Under the action of same loads, except the longitudinal positive moment of pedestal, longitudinal and transverse moment of slab, longitudinal negative moment of pedestal, transverse moment of pedestal and reaction of CA mortar are larger for frame slab ballastless track than those for plane ballastless track. (2) When considering the mechanical response, there are few differences between frame slab track structures and plane slab structures, but frame slab structures hold many other advantages, such us cost saving, improving construction capability and so on, which make frame slab ballastless track meet a bright foreground in China. (3) The position acted by loads influenced greatly on mechanical action of ballastless track structures, the middle of slab and the border of slab are two worst load action positions, so the larger value brought by those two load action ways should be taken in ballastless track structures design.
出处 《铁道工程学报》 EI 北大核心 2007年第8期35-38,共4页 Journal of Railway Engineering Society
关键词 元砟轨道 平板 框架板 梁-板模型 力学计算 ballastless track plane slab frame slab beam- slab model mechanical calculation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献6

  • 1林之珉 赵曦 王继军.高速铁路无碴轨道结构设计参数的研究[R].北京:铁道科学研究院,1996..
  • 2江成 林之珉 范佳.高速铁路高架桥上无碴轨道关键技术的试验研究[R].北京:铁道科学研究院,1998..
  • 3铁道第三勘测设计院 铁道科学研究院 西南交通大学.秦沈客运专线桥上无碴轨道设计技术条件[Z].北京:铁道科学研究院,2001..
  • 4中铁工程总公司三局 铁道科学研究院 铁道第三勘测设计院.秦沈客运专线桥上无碴轨道施工技术条件[Z].北京:铁道科学研究院,2001..
  • 5江成 翟婉明 陈松林.秦沈客运专线桥上无碴轨道综合试验研究[R].北京:铁道科学研究院,2003..
  • 6钱立新.世界高速铁路技术[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2003..

共引文献175

同被引文献65

引证文献8

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部