摘要
目的探讨β-肾上腺素能激动剂对肺泡上皮主动清除液体的效应及相关机制。方法48只清洁级雄性SD大鼠随机数字法分成6个组[正常对照组、多巴酚丁胺组、阿米洛利(特异性钠通道阻滞剂)组、多巴酚丁胺+阿米洛利组、多巴酚丁胺+阿替洛尔(高度选择性(1-肾上腺素能阻滞剂)组、多巴酚丁胺+ICI118,551(高度选择性(2-肾上腺素能阻滞剂)组]。单核素示踪技术测定肺泡液体清除率(AFC)。逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测肺组织肺泡上皮钠通道(α、β、γ-rENaC)mRNA表达。结果(1)β2-肾上腺素能受体效应显著增加AFC:多巴酚丁胺组、多巴酚丁胺+阿替洛尔组AFC分别为(26.6±1.6)%和(25.0±4.8)%,显著高于正常对照组[(21.0±3.9)%]和多巴酚丁胺+ICI118,551组[(21.0±4.8)%](P〈0.05)。多巴酚丁胺组AFC与多巴酚丁胺+阿替洛尔组比较,差异无统计学意义(P〈0.05);正常对照组AFC与多巴酚丁胺+ICI118,551组比较,差异无统计学意义(P〈0.05)。(2)阿米洛利敏感钠通道显著影响肺泡液体清除:阿米洛利组AFC为(6.0±2.8)%,显著低于正常对照组(P〈0.05)。(3)多巴酚丁胺通过非阿米洛利敏感钠通道途径增加肺泡液体清除:多巴酚丁胺+阿米洛利组AFC为(10.0±2.3)%,显著高于阿米洛利组(P〈0.05)。(4)多巴酚丁胺上调γ-rENaC表达:多巴酚丁胺组、多巴酚丁胺+阿替洛尔组的γ-rENaC mRNA表达分别为(0.90±0.19)和(0.90±0.09),显著高于正常对照组(0.69±0.09)和多巴酚丁胺+ICI118,551组(0.68±0.06)(P均〈0.05)。多巴酚丁胺组γ-rENaC mRNA表达与多巴酚丁胺+阿替洛尔组比较,差异无统计学意义(P〈0.05);正常对照组γ-rENaC mRNA表达与多巴酚丁胺+ICI118,551组比较,差异无统计学意义(P〈0.05)。各组间α、γ-rENaC mRNA表达比较,差异无统计学意义(P均〈0.05)。(5)阿米洛利抑制多巴酚丁胺上调γ-rENaC表达:多巴酚丁胺+阿米洛利组γ-rENaC mRNA表达为(0.70±0.14),显著低于多巴酚丁胺组和多巴酚丁胺+阿替洛尔组(P均〈0.05)。结论β2-肾上腺素能激动效应增加肺泡液体清除,其机制除与上调肺泡上皮β-rENaC表达有关外,还可能与刺激非阿米洛利敏感钠通道途径有关。
Objective To investigate the effect of β-adrenergic agonist on alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) in ratsand the associated mechanism. Method Forty eight Sprague-Dawley male rats were randomly divided into six groups namely: normal control group, dobutamine group, amiloride group, dobutamine + amiamiloride group, dobutamine + atenolol group and dobutamine + ICI118, 551 group). Alveolar fluid clearance was measured by single nuclide tracer technique. The α, β, γ-rat epithelial sodium channel (α, β, γ-rENaC) InRNA expressions were measured by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results (1) AFC of dobutamine group and dobutamine + atenolol group were (26.6 + 1.6)% and (25.0 + 4.8)% respectively; The rates of AFC in avove two groups were significantly higher than those in normal control group (21.0± 3.9)% and dobutamine + ICI 118, 551 group (21.0 ±4.8)% (P〈0.05). There was not any significant difference in AFC between dobutamine group and dobutanfine + atenolol group ( P 〉 0.05) ; and not significant difference in AFC between normal control group and dobutamine + ICI 118, 551 group (P〉0.05) . (2) AFC in amiloride group was (6.0 ± 2.8) %, which was significantly lower than normal control group ( P 〈 0.05). (3) AFC in dobutamine + amiloride group was (10.0 ±2.3)%, which was significantly higher than that in amiloride group (P 〈 0.05). (4) γ-rENaC mRNA expression in dobutamine group and dobutamine + atenolol group were (0.90 ±0. 19) and (0.90± 0.09) respectively, which were significantly higher than those in normal control group (0.69 ±0.09) and dobutamine + ICI 118, 551 group (0.68 ± 0.06) (P 〈 0.05). There was not any significant difference in γ-rENaC mRNA expression between dobutamine group and dobutamine + atenolol group; and not significant difference in γ-rENaC mRNA expression between normal control group and dobutamine + ICI 118, 551 group (P 〉 0.05). There was not any significant difference in ct, γ-rENaC mRNA expressions between these groups (P〉 0.05) . (5) 7-rENaC mRNA expression in dobutamine + amiloride group was (0.70 ± 0. 14), which was significantly lower than that in dobutamine group and dobutamine + atenolol group ( P 〈 0.05). Coladuslon Beta2-adrenergic activation upregulates γ-rENaC expression and also stimulates amiloride-insensitive sodium channel (NaC) pathway to improve AFC in rats.
出处
《中华急诊医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2007年第8期814-818,共5页
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
基金
江苏省卫生厅重大课题基金(H200102),江苏省医学领域人才基金(119000009)