期刊文献+

两种福利模式下的中西税权控制 被引量:1

Comparison and Reflection:Control of Power to Tax in Welfare Models of China's Mainland and Developed Countries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 西方发达国家的税权因应社会需求不断膨胀,从而引发了"福利法治国危机"。而中国在"单位型福利模式"的政策指引下,税权亦严重失范,但其问题更多地存在于公共支出柔性强、结构不合理等方面;因此,从宏观的比较视野观之,中西都面临着税权的有效规范与控制问题,但方法却是迥异的:西方欲通过控税实现"福利国"改造;中国则应以控税的方式探求适合自己的福利模式。 The power to tax expands continually due to the increase of social demands in developed countries, which evokes "welfare state crisis". In China's Mainland, guided by the policy of "unit-based welfare system", the power to tax has also shown a serious problem of anomie, mainly caused by the flexible management and unreasonable structure of public expenditure, though. So by macroscopical comparison, we can find that China's Mainland and western developed countries confront the tasks of standardization and control of the power to tax, however, by different means. The western developed countries want to reform "welfare state" through tax control, while China's Mainland's tax control aims to establish a suitable welfare model.
作者 刘丽
机构地区 湘潭大学法学院
出处 《西南政法大学学报》 2007年第4期44-52,共9页 Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 湖南省社科联一般项目"分税改革与地方自治"
关键词 福利 税权 比较 welfare power to tax comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1徐自华.我国目前税收负担问题分析[J].经济前沿,2005(4):8-11. 被引量:2
  • 2姚轩鸽.理性关注“税负痛苦指数”[J].中国税务,2005(10):45-45. 被引量:2
  • 3[3]卡罗尔·哈洛,理查德·罗林斯.法律与行政[M].杨伟东,等,译.商务印书馆,2004:1.
  • 4[4]大卫·N·海曼.公共财政:现代理论在政策中的应用:第六版[M].章彤,译.北京:中国财政经济出版社,2001:12.
  • 5[5]薛兆丰.美国"社保"进退两难[N].南方周末,1998-02-04.
  • 6[6]Titmuss·R,Social Division of Welfare:Essays on the Welfare State[M].London:Allen and Unwin,1963.
  • 7赵伟.中国的城乡差距:原因反思与政策调整[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,57(6):742-748. 被引量:43
  • 8[8]高倍勇.中国财政困难的由来:从运行机制角度分析[EB/OL].http://www.cftl.cn/show.asp?c_id=21&a_id=3414.
  • 9郑功成.中国社会福利发展论纲--从传统福利模式到新型福利制度[J].社会保障制度,2001,(1).
  • 10刘继同.解析中国的社会福利政策模式[J].当代中国研究,2005,(1).

二级参考文献15

  • 1郭克莎.80年代中期以来我国城乡经济发展的失衡态势分析[J].社会科学战线,1997(3):61-66. 被引量:6
  • 2[1]Chen, Shaohua and Yan Wang, "China' s Growth and Poverty Reduction: Trends between 1990 and 1999",World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2001.
  • 3[2]Mark Gradstein, "The Political Economy of Public Spending on Education, Inequality, and Growth", World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3162, November 2003.
  • 4[3]Richard Kohl and Kevin O' Rourke, "What is new about Globalization: Implication for Income Inequality in Developing Countries", OECD - IEA/OECD - AIE, 2000.
  • 5[4]Shahin Yaqub, "How Equitable Is Public Spending on Health and Education?", Background Paper to WDR2000/1.
  • 6[5]World Bank, "Transition: The First Ten Years Analysis and Lessons for Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union", Washington, D.C., 2002.
  • 7[6]World Bank, "Making Transition Work for Everyone: Poverty and Inequality in Europe and Central Asia",Washington D. C., 2000.
  • 8AJ雷纳 D 科尔曼.农业经济学前沿问题[M].北京:中国税务出版社,2000..
  • 9祖田修著 张玉林译.农学原论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003..
  • 10根据<中国统计年鉴>(2003)计算所得.

共引文献271

同被引文献87

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部