效率与公平关系的物权法思考

Efficiency and Equity:A Perspective of the Law on Rights in Rem

在物权领域,浅层面的物权公平与物权效率并不矛盾。冲突存在于物权效率与高层面的社会公平之间,即物权效率自然发展导致起点不公平、机会不均等、结果不均衡。并且在这一交叉层面的"物权垄断"势能所产生的"马太效应"不可能熨平。通过物权社会化,让私人性物权效率提升为社会效率,则社会效率与社会公平能和谐一致。这种提升属政府管制时的限制,是在初次分配中重新界定权利,不是要素所有的分配,而且权利分配的财富调整功能优于再分配。

In the field of rights in rem, equity at the lower level is not contradictory with efficiency. What is contradictory is between efficiency and equity at the higher level, i.e. the natural development of efficiency gives rise to inequitable starting point, unequal opportunity and unbalanced results. At this cross -section, it is impossible to iron out the ＂Matthew effect＂ induced by the potential energy of ＂monopoly in rights in rem＂. Social efficiency and social equity can be in harmony when private efficiency is upgraded to social efficiency through the socialization of rights in rem. Being a limitation with government intervention, this upgrade is a redefinition of rights in primary distribution, not all distribution of factors , with a better wealth - adjusting function than redistribution.