《〈杜甫《石壕吏》中的老翁和石壕吏〉辨讹》辨讹

Arguments against the Clarification of the Old Man and the Official of 'Stone Trench' by Du Fu

本文针对张一平《〈杜甫《石壕吏》中的老翁和石壕吏〉辨讹》一文所提出的三个问题,逐一答辩,认为:"张文"认定杜甫写作《石壕吏》一诗时,府兵制"早已灰飞烟灭"纯属杜撰;"张文"强行把"老翁"二字拆分为"老"和"翁",并取这两个字若干个字义中的一个字义,来证明老翁必有六十岁以上是一种"不严谨、不科学"的治学态度;以历史史实说话,证明《石壕吏》中的石壕吏的确是一位法律的执行者,而老翁也的确是一个逃兵。

Thls paper makes an open answer to the three questions put forward by Zhang Ping in his arguments in the Clarification of the Old Man and the Official of ＇Stone Trench＇. The author claims that Zhang＇s opinion is not scientific and reasonable, as Zhang considers the system of army residence at mansion had been ended when Du Fu presented his the Offtcial of Stone Trench ; and Zhang splits the two words ＂Old Man＂ and adopts one of their several definitions to prove that the ＂Old Man＂ must be over 60 years old. Fi- nally, the author says that Zhang should base his arguments on history that the oglcial of Stone Trench was the executor of law and the ＂ Old Man＂ was a lamaster.