期刊文献+

近似评价函数确定运动极限及其在形状优化中的应用 被引量:3

Computation for move-limits with approximate function and its application in structure shape optimization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对二维连续体形状优化过程中解析灵敏度求解困难的情况,利用响应面方法将目标函数和约束函数近似显式化,建立序列二次规划模型。为了保证优化模型的可靠性,结合试验设计方法,以较少的结构分析代价构造约束响应面,从而能够快而稳定地收敛,本文重点研究并建立了二次近似评价函数用以计算自适应运动极限的策略。算例说明这种策略是有效而稳定的。 Based on RSM (Response Surface Methodology), the obiective function and constraint conditions are approximately explicit to overcome the difficulty of sensitivity analysis in two-dimensional continuum structures, sequential quadratic programming model is used. Combined with experiment design method, very few design points were used to obtain constraint conditions. In order to ensure the reliability of the optimization model, a second-order approximation function to each constraint function is researched and formed to compute move-limits for the current design point and adaptive move-limits evaluation is proposed. An example is given to show the efficiency and stability of this optimization strategy.
出处 《计算力学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期447-452,共6页 Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金(10472003) 北京市自然科学基金(3042002)资助项目
关键词 形状优化 响应面方法 运动极限 优化策略 shape optimization response surface methodology move-limits optimization strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1ZIENKIEWICZ J S.Campbell.Shape Optimization and Sequential Linear Programming,Optimum Structure Design[M].John Widely&Sons,New York,1973.
  • 2HAFTKA R T,SCOTT E P.Optimization and experiments-a survey[A].Theoretical and Applied Mechanics[C].Proc.of ⅪⅩ ICTAM,Kyoto,Elsevier,1997:303-321.
  • 3MOHAMMADI B,PIRONNEAU O.Applied optimal shape design[J].Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics,2002,149:193-205.
  • 4BOTKIN M E,WANG H P.Shape optimization of two-dimensional automotive components using a meshfree method[A].9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization[C].2002.
  • 5GIANNAKOGLOU K C.Design of optimal aerodynamic shapes using stochastic optimization methods and computational intelligence[J].Progress in Aerospace Sciences,2002,38:43-76.
  • 6POLONI C,PEDIRODA V.Genetic algorithms coupled with computationally expensive simulations:tools to improve efficiency[A].Genetic Algorithms and Evolution Strategies in Engineering and Computer Science[M].New York:Wiley,1998.
  • 7CHOI K K,HAUG E J.Shape design sensitivity analysis of elastic structures[J].J Struct Mech,1985,13:231-269.
  • 8LIEFOOGHE D,SHYY Y K,FLEURY C.Shape sensitivity analysis using low-and high-order elements[J].Engineering and Computers,1988,4:213-228.
  • 9BOUX W J,STANDER N,HAFTKA R T.Response surface approximations for structural optimization[J].International Journal for Numerical Method in Engineering,1998,42:517-534.
  • 10SHYY W,TUCHER P K,VAIDYANATHAN R.Response Surface and Neural Network Techniques for Rocket Engine Injector Optimization[A].AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE 35th Joint Propulsion Conference[C].1999.Paper No.99-2455.

二级参考文献8

  • 1[1]Shyy W, Tucker P K, Vaidyanathan R. Response Surface and Neural Network Techniques for Rocket Engine Injector Optimization. In: AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE 35th Joint Propulsion Conference. 1999. Paper No.99-2455
  • 2[2]Papila N, Shyy W, Haftka R, et al. Assessment of Neural Net and Polynomial-Based Techniques for Aerodynamic Applications. In: AIAA 17th Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Norfolk, VA, 1999. Paper No. 99-3167
  • 3[3]Vaidyanathan R, Papila N, Shyy W, et al. Neural Network and Response Surface Methodology for Rocket Engine Component Optimization. In: 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. 2000. Paper No.2000-4880, Long Beach, CA
  • 4[4]Papila N, Shyy W, Griffin L, et al. Preliminary Design Optimization for a Supersonic Turbine for Rocket Propulsion. In: 36th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. 2000. Paper No.2000-3242, Huntsville, AL
  • 5[5]Madsen J I, Shyy W, Haftka R T. Response Surface Techniques for Diffuser Shape Optimization. AIAA Journal,2000, 38(9): 1512-1518
  • 6[6]Papila N, Shyy W, Griffin L, et al. Shape Optimization of Supersonic Turbines Using Response Surface and Neural Network Methods. In: AIAA 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. 2001. Paper No.2001-1065
  • 7[7]Nateri K Madavan, Man Mohan Rai, Frank W Huber. Neural Net-Based Redesign of Transonic Turbines for Improved Unsteady Aerodynamic Performance. NASA/TM-1998-208754
  • 8[8]S Pierret, R A Van den Braembussche. Turbomachinery Blade Design Using a Navier-Stokes Solver and Artificial Neural Network. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery,1999, 121:326-332

共引文献19

同被引文献27

  • 1张传立,张系斌,宋天霞.结构动力形状优化中灵敏度分析的两种算法[J].江汉石油学院学报,1994,16(4):83-89. 被引量:10
  • 2贺素香,张立卫.非线性约束优化问题的一个修正Lagrangian算法[J].数学物理学报(A辑),2006,26(1):49-62. 被引量:1
  • 3彭细荣,隋允康.用ICM法拓扑优化静位移及频率约束下连续体结构[J].计算力学学报,2006,23(4):391-396. 被引量:19
  • 4Wujek B A,Renaud J E. New adaptive move-limit management strategy for approximate optimization,Parts 1 and 2[ J]. AIAA 1998,36 : 1911-1934.
  • 5Laraberti L,Pappalettere C. Comparison of the numerical efficiency of different sequential linear programming based algorithms for structural optimization problems[J]. Comput Struct, 2000,76:713-728.
  • 6Lamberti L,Pappalettere C. Move limits definition in structural optimization with sequential linear programming. Part Ⅰ : Optimization algorithm[J]. Comput Struct, 2003,81 : 197-213.
  • 7Lamberti L, Pappalettere C. Move limits definition in structural optimization with sequential linear programming. Part Ⅱ: Numerical examples[J]. Comput Struct, 2003,81:215-238.
  • 8程耿东 汪榴.形状优化数值方法与白适应运动极限.计算结构力学及其应用,1985,2(2):75-102.
  • 9BOTKIN M E, WANG H P. Shape optimization of two-dimensional automotive components using a mesh free method[C] // 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. Atlanta: [s. n. ]. 2002.
  • 10GIANNAKOGLOU K C. Design of optimal aerodynamic shapes using stochastic optimization methods and computational intelligence[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38. 43-76.

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部