论国际体育仲裁院与竞技临时仲裁及《仲裁法》的关系

On CAS' relationship with the ad hoc arbitration of competitive sports and PRC arbitration

对中国竞技体育中临时仲裁的含义及法律性质进行了初步分析,并将其与国际体育仲裁进行比较。认为,目前在我国统一仲裁制度中没有《体育仲裁法》调整体育纠纷的情况下,根据国际奥委会的规定,为了解决北京奥运会期间相关的体育纠纷,ICAS(国际体育仲裁理事)可以在北京设立一个临时的体育仲裁机构,然而,我国的仲裁法不承认临时仲裁机构,这就可能会在仲裁裁决的执行上导致中外当事人的不公平。

This paper analyzes the meaning and legal property of Chinese temporary arbitration in competitive sports and compares it with CAS. The author argues that with the current situation in which China is lack of arbitral laws to settle disputes in sports. It is a wise option for ICAS that it set up a temporary sports arbitration in Beijing to settle disputes during Beijing Olym- pic Games. However, PRC Arbitration does not recognize temporary arbitration agency, which will cause unfairness between Chinese and foreign parties in the execution of the arbitral award.