期刊文献+

海岸带生态安全响应力评估方法初探 被引量:13

Primary study on assessing the response to coastal ecological safety
下载PDF
导出
摘要 引用"驱动力-压力-状态-影响-响应力"分析模型(driving-pressure-state-impac-response,DPSIR),具体分析了海岸带生态系统安全问题中"驱动力"、"压力"、"状态"、"影响"和"响应力"及其5者之间的相互关系,总结出人类社会对海岸带生态安全"响应力"的5个主要途径:法律法规与政策、管理体制与机制、基础建设与措施、科技支撑与投入、公众意识与参与。最后根据响应力对生态安全问题产生过程(驱动力、压力、状态、影响)的反馈机制,通过模糊数学评价原理构建出评估海岸带生态安全响应力的方法体系。 The coastal ecosystem represents one of the typical ecotone, where the human activities are dense and frequent and ecological safety problems emerged gradually. The response to coastal ecological safety is the positive feedback of human society to the ecolog- ical safety problems. It is the force to keep the coastal ecosystem sustainable health and to solve, mitigate or prevent the ecological safety stress. This paper, the driving-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) analysis model was introduced and to study the relationship among Response, Driving, Pressure, State and Impact. Subsequently, the human response was classified into 5 categories, which are policy and legislation, management institution and mechanism, infrastructure and project, science and technology support, public consciousness and participation. Finally, a primary evaluation method on response to coastal ecological safety was build up by using the fuzzy mathematic assessment principles, base on the relationship between response and other four ecological safety factors.
出处 《海洋环境科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期325-328,共4页 Marine Environmental Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(40371049) 福建省自然科学基金(D031002)
关键词 海岸带 生态安全 响应力 coastal area ecological safety response assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1IGBP/LOICZ.Reports & studies No.3[R].Texel:LOICZ,1995.
  • 2BILIANA C S,ROBERT W K.Integrated Coastal and Ocean Management concepts and practices[M].Washington D.C:Island Press,1998.
  • 3钟兆站.中国海岸带自然灾害与环境评估[J].地理译报,1997,16(1):44-50. 被引量:33
  • 4薛雄志,吝涛,曹晓海.海岸带生态安全指标体系研究[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2004,43(B08):179-183. 被引量:42
  • 5郭峰,宋剑峰,赵敏.《水利产业政策》评估指标体系及测算方法研究[J].水利经济,2005,23(2):17-19. 被引量:2
  • 6LEUNG P S,MURAOKA J,NAKAMOTO S T et al.Evaluating sheries management options in Hawaii using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)[J].Fisheries Research,1998,36:171-183.
  • 7COLMENARES N A,ESCOBAR J J.Ocean and coastal issues and policy responses in the Caribbean[J].Ocean & Coastal Management,2002,45:905-924.
  • 8LEHTONEN M.The environmental social interface of sustainable development:capabilities,social capital,institutions[J].Ecological Economics,2004,49:199-214.
  • 9JULIA M C,XUE X Z,HONG H S.Lessons learned from decentralized' ICM:an analysis of Canada's Atlantic Coastal Action Program and China's Xiamen ICM Program[J].Ocean & Coastal Management,2003,46:59-76.
  • 10Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).OECD core set of indicators for environmental performance reviews[R].Paris:OECD,1993.

二级参考文献13

共引文献72

同被引文献202

引证文献13

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部