期刊文献+

ERCC4基因遗传变异对焦炉工外周血淋巴细胞DNA损伤的影响 被引量:1

Influences of excision repair cross complementation group 4 genetic variations on DNA damage in lymphocytes among coke oven workers
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨焦炉作业工人核苷酸切除修复交叉互补组4基因(excision repair cross comple- mentation group 4,ERCC4)多态性和外周血淋巴细胞DNA损伤的关联。方法选择某焦化厂246名焦炉作业工人和127名对照者,运用彗星试验评价外周血淋巴细胞DNA损伤;根据Hapmap数据库筛选ERCC4基因的标签单核苷酸多态性位点(tagged-single nucleotide polymorphisms,TagSNPs),使用Taq- Man-MGB探针荧光标记聚合酶链反应方法对′rs744154、rs3136079及rs31870 3个TagsNPs进行基因分型;运用PHASE2.0.2遗传分析软件计算单体型。结果焦炉工组外周血淋巴细胞的Olive尾矩(Olive TM)高于对照组(对数转换后分别为1.26±1.12及0.52±0.97),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。焦炉工中,3个TagsNPs的不同基因型携带者Olive TM值的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),构建的不同单体型对携带者Olive TM值的差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组中rs3136079位点TG杂合子携带者Olive TM值最低(0.26±0.96),明显低于野生型纯合子TT(0.66±0.98)及突变型纯合子GG携带者(0.66±0.51),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),构建的CTG/CTG单体型对携带者Olive TM值最高(0.69±1.01),无CTG单体型携带者Olive TM值最低(0.25±0.80),差异无统计学意义(P=0.08)。结论ERCC4基因多态性对焦炉工外周血淋巴细胞DNA损伤程度无影响,但对照组中rs3136079位点TG杂合基因型携带者DNA损伤程度较轻,表明DNA损伤程度受遗传和环境因素交互作用的影响。 Objective To investigate the relationship between excision repair cross complementation group 4 (ERCC4) gene polymorphisms and DNA damage in lymphocytes of coke oven workers and controls. Methods Two hundred and forty-six coke oven workers and one hundred and twenty-seven controls were recruited in the study, and peripheral vein blood was drawn after over night fasting. Comet assay was used to evaluate DNA damage, and TaqMan-MGB probes were used to analyze ERCC4 genetic variations including the three Tagged-single nucleotide polymorphisms (TagSNPs), referred to rs744154, rs3136079 and rs31870 which were picked out from Hapmap database. Then haplotypes were reconstructed by PHASE2.0.2 software. Results The lymphocytes Olive TM value of coke oven workers was significantly higher than that of controls (1.26± 1.12 vs 0.52± 0.97, P〈0.01). Among coke oven workers, no significant difference was found between the Olive TM of those with different genotypes or haplotype pairs at ERCC4 gene (P〉0.05). However, in the control group, the TG genotype carriers had higher Olive TM than the TT and GG genotype carriers (0.26±0.96 vs 0.66±0.98 and 0.66± 0.51, P〈0.05), and the CTG/CTG haplotype pairs carriers had the highest Olive TM (0.69±1.01), and no CTG haplotype carriers had the lowest Olive TM (0.25±0.80), and the difference was borderline (P=0.08). Conclusion The gene polymorphism at ERCC4 gene has no effects on the DNA damage of lymphocytes in coke oven workers, but the TG genotype carriers has lower DNA damage in the control. DNA damage is influenced by the interaction of genetic and environmental factors.
出处 《中华劳动卫生职业病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第8期449-452,共4页 Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases
基金 国家重点基础研究规划项目(2002CB512905) 国家自然科学基金(30371204)
关键词 多环碳氢化合物 多态性 单核苷酸 DNA损伤 Polycyclic hydrocarbons Polymorphism, single nucleotide DNA damage
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Mastrangelo G, Fadda E, Marzia V. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and cancer in man. Environ Health Perspect, 1996, 104: 1166-1170.
  • 2Tripsianes K, Folkers G, Ab E, et al. The structure of the human ERCC1/XPF interaction domains reveals a complementary role for the two proteins in nucleotide excision repair. Structure, 2005, 13: 1849-1858.
  • 3Christmann M, Tomicic MT, Roos WP, et al. Mechanisms of human DNA repair:an update. Toxicology, 2003, 193: 3-34.
  • 4The International HapMap Project. Nature, 2003, 426: 789-796.
  • 5Leadon SA, Sumerel J, Minton TA, et al. Coal tar residues produce both DNA adducts and oxidative DNA damage in human mammary epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis, 1995, 16: 3021-3026.
  • 6Brookman KW, Lamerdin JE, Thelen MP, et al. ERCC4 (XPF) encodes a human nucleotide excision repair protein with eukaryotic recombination homologs. Mol Cell Biol, 1996, 16: 6553-6562.
  • 7Lee SA, Lee KM, Park WY, et al. Obesity and genetic polymorphism of ERCC2 and ERCC4 as modifiers of risk of breast cancer. Exp Mol Med, 2005, 37: 86-90.
  • 8Milne RL, Ribas G, Gonzalez-Neira A, et al. ERCC4 associated with breast cancer risk: a two-stage case-control study using high- throughput genotyping. Cancer Res, 2006, 66: 9420-9427.
  • 9Garcia-Closas M, Malats N, Real FX, et al. Genetic variation in the nucleotide excision repair pathway and bladder cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2006, 15: 536-542.
  • 10Zienolddiny S, Campa D, Lind H, et al. Polymorphisms of DNA repair genes and risk of non-small cell lung cancer. Carcinogenesis, 2006, 27: 560-567.

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部