期刊文献+

复杂社会技术系统事故成因结构敏感性分析 被引量:7

Structural Sensitivity Analysis of Accident Causation in Complex Social-technical System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 讨论基于共同成因假设思想的事故成因理论的局限:①不考虑系统复杂性影响,认为复杂系统和简单系统都遵循同样的事故成因机理;②共同成因假设,即大小事故具有相同的成因,遵循共同成因路径;③因果律假设,即任何事故一定有清晰严格的因果链;④只注重比较重要因素,人为增加了系统的不和谐。系统地阐述复杂系统事故所具有的结构敏感性,给出了事故成因模型有效性的价值判断标准,并提出活跃元素的行为偏差及活跃元素间交互作用偏差的合成是决定复杂社会技术系统事故成因机理的学说,补充并完善了Reason的Swisscheese模型,同时构建了基于结构敏感性的事故成因模型。 The limitations of the idea of the common cause hypothesis are systematically discussed as follows : ( 1 ) neglecting the impact of system complexity, and supposing simple and complex systems follow the same mechanism of accident causation ; (2) common causes hypothesis, that is, minor or serious accidents have the same causes and follow common causes path ; (3) hypothesis of causality, that is, any accident can be traced by a clear strict cause-effect chain; (4) just focusing on the important factors, artificially increasing the system disharmony. Then, the structural sensitivity of the accidents occurring in the complex systems is expounded. The value criteria for judging the effectiveness of the accident causation models is given. Accidents causation theory of complex social-technical systems based on the combination of the behavior deflection of the active elements and deflection of interactions between active elements is put forward. Reason's Swiss Cheese model is supplemented and perfected, and new accidents causation model based on the structural sensitivity is formulated.
作者 许正权
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 2007年第6期56-62,共7页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目资助(70533050) 中国矿业大学引进人才资助项目
关键词 偏差 事故 事故成因 模型 活跃元素 蛰伏元素 复杂社会技术系统 安全管理 deflection accident accident causation model active element latent element complex social-technical system safety management
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Heinrich,H.W.,Petersen,D.Industrial Accident Prevention (Sth Ed)[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1980
  • 2林柏泉,常建华,翟成.我国煤矿安全现状及应当采取的对策分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(5):42-46. 被引量:197
  • 3Benner,L.5 Accident perceptions:their implications for accident investigators[M].In Ferry,T.S.(Ed.) Readings in Accident Investigation.Springfield Ⅲ:Charles C Thomas,1984
  • 4Wright L.& Schaaf T.V.D.Accident versus near-miss causation:a critical review of the literature,an empirical test in the UK railway domain,and their implications for other sectors[A].First European Conference in Railway Human Factors[C].York,2003
  • 5Wright,L.Towards an empirical test of the iceberg model[A].7th European Conference on Cognitive Science Approaches to Process Control.Conference proceedings[C],2000
  • 6Hammer,W.Occupational safety management and engineering[M].Prentice-Hall:New Jersey,1981
  • 7许正权,宋学锋,李敏莉.本质安全化管理思想及实证研究框架[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(12):79-85. 被引量:62
  • 8Surry,J.Industrial accident research[M].Ministry of Labour:Toronto,1979
  • 9Tarrants,W.E.Currently used measures of safety pefformance[A].In Tarrants,W.E.(Ed.).The Measurement of Safety Performance[C].Garland:New York,1980
  • 10Van Steen,J.Safety performance measurement[M].Institute of Chemical Engineers:Warwickshire,1996

二级参考文献21

共引文献253

同被引文献63

引证文献7

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部