摘要
《奉使记》作为亨利·詹姆斯晚期的优秀作品因其独特的写作手法和作者对该小说主题意义探讨所留下的空间而增加了该作品的模糊性,造成读者理解的困境。本文欲以读者反应批评的重要代表人物伊瑟尔的文本召唤结构理论分析《奉使记》,试图解析读者困境的缘由。
出处
《湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版)》
2007年第5期112-114,共3页
Journal of Xiangtan Normal University(Social Science Edition)
参考文献8
-
1[1]James,Henry.The Ambassadors[M].New York:Penguin Books,1986.
-
2[2]James,Henry.The Portable Henry James[M].Harmondsworth:Penguin Books,1977.
-
3[3]Martin,S.Day.A Handbook of American Literature[M].Queensland:University of Queensland Press,1975.
-
4[4]Selden,Raman.ed.A Reader's Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2004.
-
5[5]Zhu Gang.Twentiteth Century Western Critical Theories[M].Shanghai:Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press,2004.
-
6陈平.亨利·詹姆斯小说理论体系初探[J].贵州大学学报(社会科学版),2005,23(1):79-85. 被引量:1
-
7[8]黄源深,周立人.外国文学欣赏与批评[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2000.
-
8[9]沃尔夫冈·伊瑟尔.阅读活动[M].金元浦等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991.
二级参考文献19
-
1[22]参阅Dorothy Halle,Social Formalism, Stanford University Press,1998.
-
2[1]Bell,Michael D.The Problem of American Realism:Studies in the Cultural History of a literary Idea [M].Chicago and London:The Univ.of Chicago Press,1993.
-
3[2]Freedman,Jonathan,ed.The Cambridge Companion to Henry James[C].Cambridge Univ.Press,1998.
-
4[3]Furst,Lilian R.and Peter N.Skrine.The Critical Idiom:Naturalism[M].Methuen & Co Ltd,1971.
-
5[4]Halle,Dorothy.Social Formalism[M].Stanford Univ.Press,1998.
-
6[5]James,Henry.Letters[Z].Ed.Leon Edel.4 vols.Harvard Univ.Press,1984.
-
7[6]Literary Criticism:Essays on Literature,American Writers,English Writers[Z].The Library of America,1984.
-
8[7]Literary Criticism:French Writers,Other European Writers,The Prefaces to the New York Edition[Z].The Library of America,1984.
-
9[8]The Notebooks of Henry James [Z].Eds.F.O.Matthiessen and Kenneth B.Murdock.Chicago:Chicago Univ.Press,1981.
-
10[9]Liu,James.J.Y.,Chinese Theories of Literature[M].Chicago and London:The Univ.of Chicago Press,1975.
同被引文献8
-
1Bellringer, Allan. The Ambassadors by Henry James [ M ]. Cambridge, Massachusetts ; London, England: Harvard University Press, 1991.
-
2Freedman, Jonathan. Professions of Taste : Henry James, British Aestheticism, and Commodity Cuhure[ M]. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1990.
-
3Pater, Walter. "Conclusion"[ C ]//Eric Warner et al. (eds) The Renaissance. In Strangeness and Beauty: An Anthology of Aesthetic Criticism 1840 - 1910. Cambridge University Press, 1983.
-
4Pater, Waiter. Appreciations: with and Essay on Style [M]. London: Macmillan and Co, Limited,1924.
-
5Ruskin, John. The Education of the Senses [ C ]//Erie Warner et al. (eds) The Renaissance. In Strangeness and Beauty: An Anthology of Aesthetic Criticism 1840 - 1910. Cambridge University Press, 1983.
-
6James, Henry. Literary Criticism II: French Writers, Other European Writers, the Prefaces to the New York Edition[ M]. New York: The Library of America,1984.
-
7James, Henry. The Ambassadors [ M ]. Penguin Books, 1994.
-
8Pater, Walter. Plato and Platonism: A Series of Lectures [ M]. London: Macmillan and Co, Limited,1922.
-
1陈迪.从自然主义的角度看《奉使记》中斯特瑞塞任务失败的必然性[J].牡丹江大学学报,2014,23(10):31-34.
-
2陈丽.《奉使记》中的唯美主义与道德[J].国外文学,2010(3):81-91. 被引量:2
-
3葛根萨如拉.《奉使记》中人物心理的叙事表现[J].赤峰学院学报(自然科学版),2016,32(24):76-77.
-
4戴灿.从责任角度试析《奉使记》中史垂则的使命[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版),2012,14(5):395-396. 被引量:1
-
5一熙.从怀疑到接受——论《奉使记》中的唯美主义与道德[J].当代教育理论与实践,2010,2(6):128-131. 被引量:1
-
6张荣凡.《林中之死》与《祝福》文本召唤结构对比研究[J].中州学刊,2006(5):273-274. 被引量:2
-
7李玲玲.《牡丹亭》的文本召唤结构[J].哈尔滨学院学报,2012,33(6):76-78.
-
8汪海.召唤与等待——阅读的“城堡”[J].盐城师范学院学报(人文社会科学版),2009,29(2):41-45.
-
9石嘉璇.《奉使记》中斯特莱塞的文化身份探究[J].哈尔滨学院学报,2013,34(5):69-73. 被引量:1
-
10李敏,刘春慧.重读《月牙儿》——由文本召唤结构看《月牙儿》的多重意蕴生成的原因[J].兰州学刊,2005(5):327-328. 被引量:1