期刊文献+

概念设计方案评价的模糊多准则决策模型 被引量:22

Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for conceptual design candidates evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提出了一种概念设计方案评估的模糊多准则决策方法,以降低决策者主观偏好以及评估过程中模糊和不确定因素对决策的影响。基于对影响产品竞争力因素的分析,建立了概念设计方案评价的层次结构。建立了概念设计方案评估的模糊多准则决策数学模型,并以三角模糊数代替常规层次分析法中的标度,提出了一种模糊层次分析方法来确定评价体系中各级评价准则的权重,充分考虑多领域专家的意见和产品开发过程的风险性。最后,以应用实例对提出模型的有效性和可行性进行了验证。 A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method was proposed to evaluate the concept design candidates. In this method, fuzzy set theory, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and multi-criteria decision-making theory were used to decrease subjective preferences of decision makers' such as fuzzy and uncertain factors in evaluation process. The evaluation architecture of conceptual design candidates was established firstly based on the analysis of influencing factors on product competitiveness. Then, a mathematical model of the fuzzy multi-criteria decision for conceptual design candidate evaluation was constructed. A fuzzy AHP was proposed to determine the weights of evaluation criteria in which the triangular fuzzy numbers were utilized to substitute the scaling scheme of conventional AHP. Experts' opinions and the risk index of the product development process were also taken into account in the method. Finally, an application example was used to verify effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method.
出处 《计算机集成制造系统》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第8期1504-1510,共7页 Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
基金 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20060391029)。~~
关键词 概念设计 评价体系 模糊集理论 多准则决策 层次分析法 conceptual design evaluation architecture fuzzy set theory multi-criteria decision-making analytic hierarchy process
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1SUN J,KALENCHUK D K.Design candidate identification using neural network-based fuzzy reasoning[J].Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing,2000,16(5):382-396.
  • 2AYAG Z.An integrated approach to evaluating conceptual design alternatives in a new development environment[J].Journal of Production Research,2005,43(4):687-713.
  • 3邓丽,刘阶萍,查建中.基于QFD和CBR的产品方案设计综合评价[J].高技术通讯,2005,15(3):44-47. 被引量:6
  • 4VANEGAS L V,LABIB A W.Fuzzy approaches to evaluation in engineering design[J].ASME Journal of Mechanical Design,2005,127(1):24-33.
  • 5周庆忠,曾慧娥.机械产品设计方案的灰色模糊综合评价[J].机械设计与制造,2001(3):6-8. 被引量:13
  • 6宋玉银,蔡复之,张伯鹏,童秉枢,范晓菊,鲍亦平,梁木养.基于实例推理的产品概念设计系统[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),1998,38(8):5-8. 被引量:51
  • 7KWONG C K,BAI H.A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment[J].Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,2002,13(5):367-377.
  • 8ZEKI A.A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment[J].IIE Transactions,2005,37(9):827-842.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Song Yuyin,1996年IEEE系统、 人与控制论国际会议论文集,1996年,1220页
  • 2Jae Kyeong Kim, Chang Hee Han,Sang, Hyun Chui,Soung Hie Kim. A Knowledge-Based Approach to the Quality Function Development. 23rd International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering,1998.
  • 3Haque B U, Belecheanu R A, Barson R J, et al. Towards the application of case based reasoning to decision-making in concurrent product development (concurrent engineering). Knowledge-Based Systems, 2000, 13:101.
  • 4Windham M P,et al. Cluster analysis to improve food classification within commodity groups. Amer.Assoc, 1985,85(10):1306.
  • 5Brown, Patrick G. QFD-Echoing the voice of the customer. AT&T Technical Journal, 1991, 70(2) Mar-Apr:18.
  • 6汪利,邹慧君.机械运动方案的三级模糊综合评价[J].机械设计与研究,1998,14(1):9-11. 被引量:46
  • 7宋玉银,肖亦晖,成晔,蔡复之.产品可制造性及评价方法的研究[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),1998,38(7):111-114. 被引量:26

共引文献64

同被引文献180

引证文献22

二级引证文献183

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部