1Nandwani N,Fairfield MC,Thompson J.The effect of laryngeal mask airway insertion on the position of the internal jugular vein[J].Anaesthesia,1997,52(2):77-79.
3Takahashi S, Mizutani T, Miyabe M, et al. Hemodynamic respon- ses to tracheal intubation with laryngoscope versus light wand intu-bating device (Trachlight) in adults with normal airway [ J ] . Anesth Analg, 2002,95 (2) :480 - 484.
4Durrani M, Barwise JA, Johnson RF, et al. Intravenous chloro- procaine attenuates hemodynamic changes associated with direct la- ryngoscopy and tracheal intubation [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2000,90 (5) : 1208 - 1212.
5Takita K, Morimoto Y, Kemrnotsu O. Tracheal lidocaine attenu- ates the cardiovascular response to endotracheal intubation [ J ]. Can J Anaesth, 2001,48(8) :732 -736.
6Choyce A, Avidan MS, Harvey A, et al. The cardiovascular re- sponse to insertion of the intubating laryngeal mask airway [ J ]. Anaesthesia, 2002,57 (4) :330 - 333.
7Liao X, Yang QY, Xue FS, et al. Bolus dose remifentanil and sufentanil blunting cardiovascular intubation responses in chil- dren : a randomized, double - blind comparison [ J ]. Eur J Anaes- thesiol, 2009,26( 1 ) :73 - 80.
8Cheng EY. Assessment and management of the difficult airway in the critically HI adult [ J]. Contemporary Critical Care, 2005,3 (4) :1 - 12.
9Hamaya Y, Dohi S. Differences in cadiovascular response to air- way stimulation at different sites and blockade of the responses by lidoeaine [ J]. Anesthesiology, 2000,93 ( 1 ) :95 - 103.
10Friedman PG, Rosenberg MK, Lebenbom Mansoor M, et al. A comparison of light wand and suspension laryngoscopic intubation techniques in outpatients [J]. Anesth Analg, 1997,85 ( 3 ) : 578 - 582.
