期刊文献+

多器官功能障碍综合征病情严重度评分系统 被引量:32

Scoring System to Measure the Severity of the Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的建立多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)病情严重度评分系统。方法收集MODS临床资料,通过统计分析筛选出反映脏器功能的指标并赋予各指标反映病情严重程度的等级分值,分值范围为0~4分,0分表示脏器功能正常,1~4分表示脏器功能障碍至衰竭,据此建立MODS病情严重度评分系统。结果对MODS临床资料进行单因素和多因素统计学分析,筛选出收缩压、氧合指数、意识状态、外周血血小板计数、血总胆红素浓度、血肌酐浓度及肠鸣音、消化道出血情况作为反映心血管、肺、脑、凝血、肝脏、肾脏和胃肠7个脏器系统功能状态的指标,结合所赋予的等级分值,建立MODS病情严重度评分系统。根据患者各指标的实际情况对各脏器功能进行评分,将各脏器功能状态的评分分值相加后得到MODS总分,总分值最高为24分。MODS评分与病死率的关系显示,随着MODS总分的增加,病死率显著增加(P<0.001)。结论本评分系统可用于评价MODS患者的病情严重程度。 Objective To develop a scoring system to measure the severity of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Methods The clinical data of patients with MODS were collected and analyzed prospectively. Seven indicators were screened out to assess the functions of seven organs. Each indicator was scored from 0 to 4 points, with the 0 point representing the normal organ function, and 1 point to 4 points representing the dysfuntion to failure of the organ. Acording to the index and points a severity scoring system were developed. Results Seven indicators including the systolic pressure, oxygenation index, conscious state, peripheral blood platelet count, blood total bilirubin, and serum creatinine were used to represent the functions of seven organs. The seven organs included cardiovascular system, lung, brain, coagulative system, liver, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract. The severity scoring system were composed of seven indicators and their points. The total score was 24 points. The mortality increased along with the increase of the points ( P 〈 0. 001 ). Conclusion This scoring system can be used to assess the severity of the MODS.
出处 《中国医学科学院学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期497-500,共4页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
基金 北京市科技计划项目(H020920050130) 北京市科技新星计划(2004A32)~~
关键词 多器官功能障碍综合征 病情严重度 评分 multiple organ dysfunction syndrome severity score
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献15

  • 1王今达,王宝恩.多脏器功能失常综合征(MODS)病情分期诊断及严重程度评分标准(经庐山’95全国危重病急救医学学术会讨论通过)[J].中国危重病急救医学,1995,7(6):346-347. 被引量:1413
  • 2夏志洁,杨涵铭.APACHE Ⅱ危重病评分系统在ICU中的应用[J].急诊医学,1996,5(1):3-8. 被引量:20
  • 3[1]Clermont G, Angus D C, DiRusso SM, et al. Predicting hospital mortality for patients in the intensive care unit: a comparison of artificial neural networks with logistic regression models. Crit Care Med, 2001, 29:1303-10
  • 4[2]Green C, Dinnes J, Takeda A, et al. Clinical effectiveness and effectiveness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) (Xigris(R)) for the treatment of severe sepsis in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess, 2005,9(11):1
  • 5[3]John C. Marshall, Deborah J.Cook, Nicolas V.Christou, et al.Multiple organ dysfunction score: A reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med, 1995, 23:1638-1652
  • 6[4]Vincent JL, Moreno R, Rakala J, et al. European Society of Intensive Care Medicine The SOFA (Sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med, 1996, 22:707-710
  • 7[6]Hanley J, McNeil B. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.Radiology, 1983, 148:839-843
  • 8[7]Wood JD. Enteric nervous control of motility in the upper gastrointestinal tract in defensive state. Dig Dis Sci, 1999, 44(8):44-52
  • 9[8]Hagger R, Finlaysonc, Jeffrey L, et al. Role of the interstitial cells of cajal in the control of gut motility. Br J Surg, 1997, 84:445-450
  • 10[9]Kunze WAA, Furness JB. The enteric nervous system and regulation of intestinal motility. Annu Rev Physiol, 1999,61:117-42

共引文献1452

同被引文献352

引证文献32

二级引证文献309

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部