摘要
目的研究更适合机械通气患者气管内吸痰的方式。方法选取外科重症监护病房(SICU)和急诊重症监护病房(EICU)机械通气治疗的61例患者为研究对象,随机选择使用密闭式气管内吸痰(CS)和开放式气管内吸痰(OS)两种吸痰方式,于吸痰前后记录脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)的变化并比较两组患者并发症例数。结果吸痰中、吸痰后0.5minOS治疗组各时点SpO2值较吸痰前1min下降明显(P〈0.05),CS治疗组吸痰前后SpO2值无显著差异(P〉0.05)。两组并发症比较无显著差异(P〉0.05)。结论CS对机械通气患者更有利。
Objective To find a better way of endotracbeal suction and care in patients on mechanical ventilation. Methotis Sixty - one patients who were on mechanical ventilation in SICU or EICU were divided at random into the CS ( closed endotracbeal, suctioning) group (therapeutic group, 30 patients) and the OS (open endotracbeal suctioning) group (contrast group, 31 patients). The data of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry( SpO2 ) were obtained before and after suction. The cases of complication incidence were compared between two groups. Results There was a significant decrease in SpO2 after OS ( P 〈 0.05 ). The differences were not statistically significant before and after CS. There was no differences in complication incidence between two groups (P 〈 0.05) . Conclusion CS has a good therapeutic effect for patients on mechanical ventilation.
出处
《中华当代医学》
2007年第4期10-11,共2页
Chinese Modern Medicine
关键词
密闭式吸痰管
机械通气
脉搏血氧饱和度
Closed Tracheal Suction Catheter
Mechanical ventilation
Oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry