期刊文献+

中美日战略关系:争取共赢和避免安全困境 被引量:6

China-U.S.-Japan Strategic Relations:Seeking Common Benefits and Avoiding a Security Dilemma
原文传递
导出
摘要 在中美日三国关系中,共同利益与结构性矛盾并存。中美、中日之间相互依存的经济关系将促进三国之间的正面互动。在传统安全领域和非传统安全领域,中美日三国间存在共同利益。中美日在国际体系、民族主义、经济、社会现代化程度等方面又存在结构性矛盾。现在美国和日本对中国实行"两面下注"政策,有可能会导致中日、中美双方之间出现安全困境。这种安全困境不符合各方利益。在当前和今后相当长时期内,中美日三国有必要做出重大努力,通过多重路径来防止美日两国与中国之间出现安全困境。 There are both shared interests and structural conflicts in the relationship among China, the United States, and Japan. The economic interdependence between China and the United States and between China and Japan has promoted positive interactions among the three countries. China, the United States, and Japan have shared common interests in both the non-traditional and traditional security fields. However, the three countries have structural conflicts in terms of the international system, nationalism, the economy, and social modernization. Currently both the United States and Japan are pursuing a policy of hedging toward China, which may lead to a security dilemma between the two. Such a situation would not be in accordance with the interests of all sides. At present and in the near future, it is necessary for China, the United States, and Japan to make greater efforts, through multiple routes, to prevent the emergence of a security dilemma among them.
作者 夏立平
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第9期31-38,共8页 World Economics and Politics
基金 复旦大学美国研究中心教育部人文社科重点基地重大项目"反恐时代的美国国家安全战略"研究课题的成果之一
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Steven R. Weisman," Smooth US - China Relations," New York Times, May 24, 2007.
  • 2Speech by General Colin Powel, at the US - China relations Conference hosted by the Texas A&M University on November 5, 2007, http://www. whitehouse, gov.
  • 3Henry M. Paulson, Jr. ,"A broad Dialogue with China, " Washington Post, December 11,2006.
  • 4刘浩远.《中日经贸合作空前发展走向互利合作多元格局》,载《解放日报》,2007年4月7日.
  • 5中华人民共和国主席胡锦涛在美国西雅图午餐会上的讲话.《深化互利合作促进共同发展》,载《人民日报》,2006年4月20日.
  • 6朱周良.《中国5月份减持美国债66亿美元》,载《上海证券报》,2007年7月19日.
  • 7《反分裂国家法》第八条内容.
  • 8Lowell Dittmer, “The Strategic Triangle: An Elementary Game - Theoretical Analysis,” World Politics, Vol. 33, No. 4, 1981, p. 34.
  • 9Lowell Dittmer, “The Strategic Triangle: An Elementary Game - Theoretical Analysis,” p. 34.
  • 10佐利克.2005年9月21日在美国美中关系全国委员会的演讲:《中国往何处去?—从正式成员到承担责任》,载上海国际问题研究所编.《2006国际形势年鉴》,上海:上海辞书出版社,2006年版,第532页.

共引文献45

同被引文献101

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部