期刊文献+

谁能为“不会说话的鱼儿”说话——以“原告资格”为核心构建我国环境公益诉讼制度 被引量:2

Who Can Speak for the"Unspeakable Fish"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统诉讼理论要求原告必须"与本案有直接利害关系",但国外的诉讼理论与实践已对此作出修正并不断拓展原告的范围。解决人与自然关系的紧张是和谐社会构建的要义之一,环境公益诉讼制度构建则是此要义实现之一途。根据我国实际情况,从诉讼制度上要解决的核心问题就是原告资格。放宽原告资格是构建我国环境公益诉讼制度的基点。 Traditional litigation theory requires that the plaintiff of a lawsuit must have "direct interest relationship with the case" . But many foreign countries has mended this theory and enlarged the scope of plaintiff. To resolve the tight relationship between the human beings and the nature is a crucial element in constructing a harmonious society, while the construction of environment public interest litigation system is a way to achieve this element. According to the reality in China, the core problem that is needed to solve in litigation system is just Standing. A primary issue in constructing our environment public interest litigation system is the enlargement of standing.
作者 张式军
机构地区 山东大学法学院
出处 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第3期10-15,共6页 Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词 环境公益诉讼 原告资格 公民诉讼 environment public interests litigation standing citizen suit
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1姜明安主编,于安等.行政法与行政诉讼法[M]高等教育出版社,2005.
  • 2蔡守秋.环境资源法学教程[M]武汉大学出版社,2000.

同被引文献35

引证文献2

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部