期刊文献+

基于团队过程视角的董事会与企业绩效关系研究述评 被引量:7

原文传递
导出
摘要 关于董事会与企业绩效关系的现有研究主要把董事会特征(如规模、多样性等)作为衡量董事会的替代变量,探讨董事会对企业绩效的影响。这类研究将董事会视为"过程黑箱",忽视了董事会的内部运行过程。本文对西方学者的董事会过程研究和相关理论基础进行了综述,构建并阐释了基于团队过程的董事会与企业绩效关系的研究框架,最后指出了该视角对我国企业实践的启示意义,并展望了该领域未来的研究方向。
作者 陈昀 贺远琼
出处 《外国经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第8期51-57,共7页 Foreign Economics & Management
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Coles,W, McWilliams, V B, and Sen, N. An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms to performance[J]. Journal of Management, 2001,27( 1 ) : 23- 50.
  • 2Nicholson, G J, and Kiel, G C. Breakthrough board performance: How to harness your board's intellectual capital[J].Corporate Governance, 2004,4 (1) : 5- 23.
  • 3Daily, C M, Johnson, J L, and Dalton, R. On the measurement of board composition: Poor consistency and a serious mismatch of theory and operationalization[J]. Decision Science, 1999,30(1) : 83-106.
  • 4Levrau, A, and Van den Berghe. Corporate governance and board effectiveness: Beyond formalism[R]. Working Paper, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, 2007.
  • 5Pettigrew,A M. On studying managerial elites[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992,13(8) : 163-182.
  • 6Finkelstein,S,and Hambrick,D C. Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations[M]. Minneapolis, St Paul: West Publishing, 1996.
  • 7Niamh,B. Boards of directors and firm performance:Is there an expectation gap[J]. Corporate Governance,2006,14(6):577-593.
  • 8Dalton,D R,Daily,C M,Ellstrand,A E, and J ohnson,J L. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition leadership structure and finan cial performance[J].Strategic Management Journal, 1998,19(3) :269-290.
  • 9Cohen, S G, and Bailey, D R. What makes terms work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite[J]. Journal of Management,1997,23(3):239-290.
  • 10Hackman,J R, and Morris, C G. Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration[M]. San Diego : Academic Press, 1975.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Cohen S G & Bailey, D R. What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite[J]. Journal of Management, 1997, 23(3) : 239-290.
  • 2Campion, M A, Medsker, G J & Higgs, A C. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: implications for designing effective work groups[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1993, 46(4): 823-850.
  • 3Campion, M A, Papper, E M, & Medsker, G J. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: a replication and extension[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1996, 49(2): 429-452.
  • 4Klimoski, R & Mohammed, S. Team mental model: construct of metaphor? [J]. Journal of Management, 1994, 20(2): 403-437.
  • 5Mathieu, J E, Heffner, T S, Goodwin, G F, Salas, E, & Cannon-Bowers, J A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(2): 273-283.
  • 6Lester, S W, Meglino, B M, Korsgaard, M A. The antecedents and consequences of group potency.- a longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(2): 352-368.
  • 7Pearee, C L, Gallagher, C A, & Ensley, M D. Confidence at group level of analysis: a longitudinal investigation of the relationship between potency and team effectiveness[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2002,75(1), 115-119.

共引文献45

同被引文献95

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部