期刊文献+

Ultrasound and Microbubbles: Their Functions in Gene Transfer In Vitro

Ultrasound and Microbubbles:Their Functions in Gene Transfer In Vitro
下载PDF
导出
摘要 To examine the role of ultrasound in gene delivery in vitro, three cells lines were exposed to the low-frequency ultrasound of varying intensities and for different durations to evaluate their effect on gene transfection and cell viability of the cells. Microbubble (MB), Optison (10%), was also used to observe the role of the microbubbles in gene transfection. The results demonstrated that as the ultrasound intensity and the exposure time increased, the gene transfer rate increased and the cell viability decreased, but at high energy intensities, the cell viability decreased dramatically, which caused the transfer rate to decrease. The most efficient ultrasound intensity for inducing gene transfer was 1 W/cm^2 with duration being 20 s. At the same energy intensity, higher ultrasound intensity could achieve maximal gene transfer rate earlier. Microbubbles could increase ultrasound-induced cell gene transfer rate by about 2 to 3 times mainly at lower energy intensities. Moreover, microbubbles could raise the maximum gene transfer rate mediated by ultrasound. It is concluded that the low-frequency ultrasound can induce cell gene transfer and the cell gene transfer rate and viability are correlated with not only the ultrasound energy intensity but also the ultrasound intensity, the higher ultrasound intensity achieves its maximal transfer rate more quickly and the ultrasound intensity that can induce optimal gene transfer is 1 W/cm^2 with duration being 20 s, and microbubbles can significantly increase the maximal gene transfer rate in vitro. To examine the role of ultrasound in gene delivery in vitro, three cells lines were exposed to the low-frequency ultrasound of varying intensities and for different durations to evaluate their effect on gene transfection and cell viability of the cells. Microbubble (MB), Optison (10%), was also used to observe the role of the microbubbles in gene transfection. The results demonstrated that as the ultrasound intensity and the exposure time increased, the gene transfer rate increased and the cell viability decreased, but at high energy intensities, the cell viability decreased dramatically, which caused the transfer rate to decrease. The most efficient ultrasound intensity for inducing gene transfer was 1 W/cm^2 with duration being 20 s. At the same energy intensity, higher ultrasound intensity could achieve maximal gene transfer rate earlier. Microbubbles could increase ultrasound-induced cell gene transfer rate by about 2 to 3 times mainly at lower energy intensities. Moreover, microbubbles could raise the maximum gene transfer rate mediated by ultrasound. It is concluded that the low-frequency ultrasound can induce cell gene transfer and the cell gene transfer rate and viability are correlated with not only the ultrasound energy intensity but also the ultrasound intensity, the higher ultrasound intensity achieves its maximal transfer rate more quickly and the ultrasound intensity that can induce optimal gene transfer is 1 W/cm^2 with duration being 20 s, and microbubbles can significantly increase the maximal gene transfer rate in vitro.
出处 《Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Medical Sciences)》 SCIE CAS 2007年第4期479-482,共4页 华中科技大学学报(医学英德文版)
基金 This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (No 30670620) Fund for Returning Scholars of the Ministry of Education of China (No JWSL2005-383)
关键词 ULTRASOUND MICROBUBBLE gene delivery ultrasound microbubble gene delivery
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1DongpingGUO,XiaoyuLI,PingSUN,ZhiguangWANG,XiuyingCHEN,QiCHEN,LemingFAN,BinZHANG,LizhengSHAO,XiaorongLI.Ultrasound/Microbubble Enhances Foreign Gene Expression in ECV304 Cells and Murine Myocardium[J].Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica,2004,36(12):824-831. 被引量:12
  • 2张超,邓又斌,张青萍.超声造影剂在基因转移中的作用[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2004,13(11):868-869. 被引量:4
  • 3Jin Liu,Thomas N. Lewis,Mark R. Prausnitz.Non-Invasive Assessment and Control of Ultrasound-Mediated Membrane Permeabilization[J].Pharmaceutical Research.1998(6)
  • 4Chen Y C,Liang H D,Zhang Q P et al.Pluronic block copolymers: Novel functions in ultrasound- mediated gene transfer and against cell damage[].Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.2006
  • 5Feril L B.Kondo T .Biological effects of low intensity ultrasound: the mechanism involved,and its implications on therapy and on biosafety of ultrasound[].Journal of Radiation Research.2004
  • 6Donnelly J,,Berry K,Ul mer JB.Technical and regulatory hurdles for DNAvaccines[].International Journal for Parasitology.2003
  • 7ZHANG Chao,DENG You-bin,ZHANG Qing-ping.Department of Ultrasound,Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030,China.Effect of ultrasound contrast agent on gene delivery[].Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography.2004
  • 8L iu J,Lew is TN,P rausn itz M R.Non-invas ive assessm en t and con tro l o f u ltrasound-m ed iated m em brane pe rm eab ilization[].Pharmaceutical Research.1998
  • 9Koike H,Tomita N,Azuma H, et al.An efficient gene transfer methodmediated by ultrasound and microbubbles into the kidney[].The Journal of Genetic Medicine.2005
  • 10.Ultrasound/Microbubble Enhances Foreign Gene Expression in ECV304 Cells and Murine Myocardium[].Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica.2004

二级参考文献39

  • 1Price RJ, Skyba DM, Kaul S, et al. Delivery of colloidal particles and red blood cells to tissue through microvessel ruptures created by targeted microbubble destruction with ultrasound. Circulation, 1998, 98:1264-1267.
  • 2Forbes SJ, Hodgson HJ. Gene therapy in gastroenterology and hepatology. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 1997, 11:823-836.
  • 3Unger EC, Hersh E, Vannan M, et al. Local drug and gene delivery through microbubbles. Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 2001, 44:45-54.
  • 4Unger EC, McCreery TP, Schweitzer RH, et al. Acoustically active lipospheres containing paclitaxel: a new therapeutic ultrasound contrast agent. Invest Radiol, 1998, 33:886-892.
  • 5Unger EC, McCreery TP, Sweitzer R. Ultrasound enhancement of gene expression from liposomal transfection. Radiology, 1997, 205(S):S724.
  • 6Porter TR, Xie F. Therapeutic ultrasound for gene delivery. Echocardiography, 2001, 18:349-353.
  • 7Matsumura T, Moriyasu F, Toda Y, et al. Ultrasound exposure enhances the biological action of interferon in the liver. J Drug Target, 2002, 10:205-209.
  • 8Porter TR, Iversen PL, Li S, et al. Interaction of diagnostic ultrasound with synthetic oligonucleotide-labeled perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin microbubbles. J Ultrasound Med, 1996, 15:577-584.
  • 9Unger EC, McCreery TP, Sweitzer R, et al. Ultrasound enhancement of gene expression and gene delivery using acoustically active carriers. Macromolecular Drug Delivery Conference. Breckenridge, 1999. 20.
  • 10Unger EC, McCreery TP, Sweitzer R, et al. MRX 501: a novel ultrasound contrast agent with therapeutic properties. Acad Radiol, 1998, 5:S247-S249.

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部