期刊文献+

霸权国对多边主义制度的有限参与——以冷战后美国参与东盟地区论坛为例 被引量:7

The Hegemonic Power's Limited Participation in an Institution of Multilateralism——The Case of the US Participation in the ASEAN Regional Forum
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文首先对霸权国家参与多边主义制度的原因进行简要的理论回顾,然后通过冷战后美国参与东盟地区论坛的个案考察霸权国家有限参与多边主义制度的行为与原因。本文认为,由于对政策自主性的约束是多边主义制度解决问题的有效性以及对霸权国家产生合法化效应的重要来源,约束程度较低的多边主义制度虽然可使霸权国家以低成本的投入参与其中,但也会造成低收益的预期。此时,霸权国家就会选择有限参与。 This article first briefly reviews the reasons why a hegemonic power chooses to participate in the institution of multilateralism, and then analyzes the behavior and causes of a hegemonic power's limited participation in an institution of multilateralism by the case of the US participation in the ARF. This article argues that because the binding on policy autonomy is the essential basis of the effectiveness of an institution of multilateralism to solve problems and the important source of the legitimatizing effects of a hegemonic power, although a lowly binding institution of multilateralism can allow a hegemonic power's participation by low costs, it only gives the hegemonic power the expectation of less benefits. In such circumstances, the hegemonic power will choose limited participation.
作者 刘宏松
出处 《外交评论(外交学院学报)》 CSSCI 2007年第4期67-76,共10页 Foreign Affairs Review
关键词 霸权国家 多边主义制度 美国 东盟地区论坛 多边安全合作 hegemonic power institution of multilateralism the United States ASEAN Regional Forum multilateral security cooperation
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1约翰·鲁杰.《对作为制度的多边主义的剖析》[A].约翰·鲁杰(苏长和等译)主编.《多边主义》[C].浙江人民出版社,2003年版.第6页、第9页.
  • 2陈东晓.试论国际制度的本质特征及其与美国霸权的互动关系[J].国际政治研究,2004,25(3):5-14. 被引量:17
  • 3利莎·马丁.《理性国家对多边主义的选择》,载于约翰·鲁杰主编,苏长和等译.《多边主义》,浙江人民出版社,2003年,第104—134页.
  • 4John Ikenbery, "Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and Persistence of American Postwar Order," International Security, Vol. 23, No. 3(Winter, 1998/1999).pp.43-78.
  • 5斯蒂夫·韦伯.《构建战后均势:北约中的多边主义》,约翰·鲁杰主编.《多边主义》,苏长和等译,杭州:江人民出版社,2003年版,第266-334页
  • 6Martin H Folly,“Breaking the Vicious Circle: Britain, the United States and the Genesis of the North Atlantic Treaty,”Diplomatic History, Vol. 12, No. 2(Winter, 1988), pp.75-76.
  • 7Daniel Deudney and John Ikenbery, "Realism, Structural Liberalism, and the West Order," Ethan B. Kapstein and Michael Mastanduno, eds., Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies After the Cold War(New York: Columbia University Press, 1999),p.111.
  • 8Stewart Patrick, “Multilateralism and its Discontents: The Causes and Consequences of U. S. Ambivalence,”Stewart Patrick eds., Multilateralism and U. S. Foreign Policy: Ambivalent Engagement(Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002),pp.2-7.
  • 9Davis B. Bobrow, "Hegemony Management," The Pacific Review, Vol. 12, No. 2(Summer, 1999).p.176.
  • 10Kent E. Calder, Asia's Deadly Triangle: How Arms, Energy, and Growth Threaten to Destabilize Asia-Pacific(London: Nicholas Brealy Publishing, 1997),p. 194.

二级参考文献77

共引文献75

同被引文献143

引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部