期刊文献+

国家体育场钢屋盖结构地震损伤诊断模拟分析 被引量:1

SIMULATION ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC DAMAGE DIAGNOSIS ON THE STEEL ROOF STRUCTURE OF NATIONAL STADIUM
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为诊断大跨度空间结构的损伤,提出了三阶段损伤诊断方法,第一阶段确定可能损伤区域,第二阶段确定可能损伤单元,第三阶段确定可能损伤单元的损伤程度.提出了一种基于柔度矩阵差的损伤指标FDI,用于判定可能损伤区域;采用损伤定位向量法确定可能损伤单元;采用二阶特征灵敏度分析确定损伤程度.以国家体育场钢屋盖结构为算例,以罕遇地震作用下弹塑性时程分析结果为模拟损伤依据,完成了三种损伤模式的损伤诊断数值模拟分析.结果表明,三阶段损伤诊断法能有效诊断大跨空间结构的损伤. In order to diagnose the damage of long-span spatial steel structures, a three - stage damage diagnosis approach was proposed. In three stages, the potentially damaged regions, potentially damaged elements, and damage severity were successively determined. A flexibility-matrix-based damage index FDI (flexibility difference index) was de.veloped to determine damage regions, the damage locating vectors method was utilized to locate damaged elements, and the second-order eigensensitivity analysis was employed to estimate the damage severity. Then according to the results of elasto-plastic time history analyses of the steel roof structure of National Stadium,three damage patterns were simulated. Furthermore, numerical simulated analyses of damage diagnosis of the steel roof structure of National Stadium was carried out. The result showed that the three-stage damage diagnosis approach could effectively diagnose the seismic damage of long-span spatial structures.
出处 《动力学与控制学报》 2007年第3期271-277,共7页 Journal of Dynamics and Control
基金 北京市自然科学基金重点资金项目(8041002) 国家自然科学基金重大国际(地区)合作研究项目(50420120133)~~
关键词 三阶段损伤诊断法 损伤指标 损伤定位向量 灵敏度分析 大跨度空间钢结构 three-stage damage diagnosis method, damage index, damage locating vectors, sensitivity analysis, long-span spatial steel structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1[1]Doeling SW,Farrar CR,Prime MB.A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods.Journal of the Shock and Vibration Digest,1998,30 (2):91 ~ 105
  • 2[2]Sohn H,Farrar CR,Hemez FM,et al.A review of structural health monitoring literature:1996 -2001.Technical Report Annex to SAMCO Summer Academy,Los Alamos National Laboratory:Cambridge,2003
  • 3[3]Pandey AK,Biswas M.Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility.Journal of Sound and Vibration,1994,169(1):3 ~ 17
  • 4[4]Aktan A E,Toksoy T.Bridge -condition assessment by modal flexibility.Experimental Mechanics,1994,34:271 ~278
  • 5[5]Patjawit A,Kanok-Nukulchai W.Health monitoring of highway bridges based on a Global Flexibilty Index.Engineering Structures,2005,27 (9):1385 ~ 1391
  • 6[6]Bernal D,Gunes B.Load vectors for damage localization.Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2002,128 (1):7 ~ 14
  • 7[7]Bernal D,Gunes B.Flexibility based approach for damage characterization:benchmark application.Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2004,130 (1):61 ~ 70
  • 8[8]Ji X D,Qian J R.Damage diagnosis to a two-story steel braced -frame model structure,Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure.Shen Zhen,2005,2:799 ~ 805
  • 9[9]Spencer BF Gao Y,Yang G.Distributed computing strategy for damage monitoring employing smart sensors,Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure.Shenzhen,2005,1:35 ~ 47
  • 10[10]Gao Y,Spencer BF.Online damage diagnosis for civil infrastructure employing a flexibility-based approach.Journal of Smart Material and Structures,2006,15 (1):9~ 19

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部