期刊文献+

腹腔镜下肾切除术转手助腹腔镜与转开放手术的疗效比较 被引量:1

Comparison between open and hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy converted from difficult laparo-scopic nephrectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对困难腹腔镜下肾切除手术进行探索,并观察转手助腹腔镜与转开放手术的术中与术后临床指标,为临床应用提供参考。方法1999年12月至2006年11月行各类腹腔镜下肾切除手术273例,23例因出血、粘连、肿瘤侵犯周围脏器等原因改变手术方式。其中转手助腹腔镜手术组12例,男8例,女4例,年龄19-73岁,平均52岁,左侧7例,右侧5例;转开放手术组11例,男6例,女5例,年龄32-68岁,平均48岁,左侧5例,右侧6例。观察2组改变手术方式后的手术时间、出血量、切口长度、术后起床活动时间、肛门排气时间、住院时间等指标。结果转开放组1例死亡,其余病例均顺利完成。转手助腹腔镜组改变手术方式后手术时间为(40.1±12.5)min,术中出血量(377±311)ml,切口长度(6.2±2.7)cm,肛门排气时间(2.2±0.6)d,下床活动时间(2.2±1.1)d,术后住院时间(5.4±1.6)d;转开放手术组改变手术方式后手术时间(80.2±37.6)min,术中出血量(854士306)ml,切口长度(19.8士2.5)cm,肛门排气时间(2.5±0.5)d,下床活动时间(4.2±0.8)d,术后住院时间(10.2±2.9)d。与转开放组相比,转手助腹腔镜组在改变手术方式后手术时间、出血量、切口长度、下床活动时间、术后住院时间方面均有明显优势(P〈0.01)。结论腹腔镜下肾切除手术遇到困难时,转手助腹腔镜手术可作为一项安全合理的选择,较转开放手术出血少、创伤小,恢复快。 Objective To compare the clinical results of open and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy converted from difficult laparoscopic nephrectomy. Methods From December 1999 to November 2006, 273 patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy. Of them, 23 cases accepted operative style conversion for bleeding, severe adhesion or tumor infiltration. Twelve difficult cases were converted into hand-assisted laparoscopic operation (8 men and 4 women) and 11 cases were converted into open surgery (6 men and 5 women). Clinical data including operative time, estimated blood loss, incision length, passage of gas by anus time, bed off time, postoperative hospital stay were recorded and compared. Results One patient died of bleeding in open group, and the others were performed successfully. In hand-assisted laparoscope group, operative time after conversion was (40. 1±12.5) min, estimated blood loss was (377±311)ml, incision length was (6.2±2. 7)cm, passage of flatus time was (2.2±0.6)d, out of bed time was (2.2±1.1)d, postoperative hospital stay was (5.4±1.6)d. In open group, operative time after conversion was (80.2±37.6)min, estimated blood loss was (854±306)ml, incision length was (19.8±2.5)cm, passage of flatus time was (2.5±0.5)d, resume walking time was (4.2±0.8) d, postoperative hospital stay was (10.2±2.9) d. Compared to open group, hand-assisted laparoscope group had obvious advantage in operative time after conversion,estimated blood loss, incision length, resume walking time and postoperative hospital stay(P〈0.01).Conclusions Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy is a good choice when laparoscopic nephrectomy is difficult or in urgent situation.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第9期588-591,共4页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 腹腔镜 肾切除术 手助腹腔镜 Laparoscope Nephrectomy Hand-assisted laparoscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper N J, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol, 1991,146:278-282.
  • 2Nakada SY, Moon TD, Gist M, et al. Use of the pneumo sleeve as an adjunct in laparoscopic nephrectomy. Urology, 1997,49:612-613.
  • 3Gill IS. Hand asisited laparoscopy : con. Urology, 2001,58 : 313 -317.
  • 4Hanna GB,Elamass M,Cuschieri A. Ergonomics of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg, 2001,8: 92-95.
  • 5张晨光,谢立平.泌尿外科腹腔镜技术平台的变迁、应用及展望[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(7):498-500. 被引量:6
  • 6Gill IS, Schweizer D, Hobart MG, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the Cleveland clinic experience. J Urol,2000,163: 1665-1670.
  • 7Jeschke K, Wakonig J, Pitzler C, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a single-center experience of 51 cases. Tech Urol, 2000,6 :9-11.
  • 8周兴,陈志光,邓振农,苏宇,曾格瓦,谢文琪.后腹腔镜下包膜内切除严重感染粘连性无功能肾的术式探讨[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(4):259-261. 被引量:5
  • 9张旭,马鑫,王少刚,郑涛,朱庆国,陈忠,郭小林,叶章群.后腹腔镜包膜下肾切除术治疗严重感染粘连性无功能肾(附12例报告)[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2004,25(5):296-299. 被引量:63
  • 10McGinnis DE,Gomella LG, Strup SE. Comparison and clinical evaluation of hand-assist devices for hand-assisted laparoscopy. Tech Urol,2001,7;57-61.

二级参考文献44

  • 1Moore RG,Chen RN,Hedican SP.Laparoscopic subcapsular nephrectomy.J Endourol,1998,12:263-264.
  • 2Hinman F.Atlas of urologic surgery.Pennsylvania:W.B.Saunders Company,1989.781.
  • 3Xu Zhang,Zhang-Qun Ye,Zhong Chen,et al.Comparison of open surgery vs retroperitoneoscopic approaches to chyluria.J Urol,2003,169:991-993.
  • 4Gill IS,Grune MT,Munch LC.Access technique for retroperitoneoscopy.J Urol,1996,156:1120-1124.
  • 5Kerbl K,Clayman RV,McDougall EM,et al.Transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign disease of the kidney:a comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical technique.Urology,1994,43:607-613.
  • 6Hemal AK,Gupta NP,Wadhwa SN,et al.Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy for benign nonfunctioning kidneys:a single-center experience.Urology,2001,57:644-649.
  • 7Lee KS,Kim HO,Byun SS,et al.Laparoscopic nephrectomy for tuberculous nonfunctioning kidney:comparison with laparoscopic simple nephrectomy for other diseases.Urology,2002,60:411-414.
  • 8Hemal AK,Gupta NP,Kumar R.Comparison of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy with open surgery for tuberculous nonfunctioning kidneys.J Urol,2000,164:32-35.
  • 9Nakada SY,Moon TD, Gist M,et al. Use of the pneamo sleeve & an laparoscopic nephrectomy. Urology, 1996,49:712-613.
  • 10Xie Liping, Lou Guoguang. Hand assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy:initial case report. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science),2001,2:456-456.

共引文献68

同被引文献4

  • 1Borin JF.Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy:long-term outcomes.Curr Opin Urol,2008,18:139-144.
  • 2Eng MK,Shalhav AL.Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy:long-term outcomes.Curr Opin Urol,2008,18:157-162.
  • 3Eskicorapci SY,Teber D,Schulze M,et al.Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy:the new gold standard surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma.Scientific World Journal,2007,7:825-836.
  • 4马亮,余大敏,张志根,李新德,芮雪芳,李恭会,丁国庆.泌尿外科同侧二次腹腔镜手术体会[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2008,29(9):609-612. 被引量:7

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部