期刊文献+

盟主的气度,历史的高度——“文艺自由论辩”中鲁迅对胡秋原保持缄默态度原因之探析 被引量:2

The Tolerance of the Leader,the Stature of the History——A Research to Why Lu Xun Kept Silent in the Debate of Literary Liberty between the Left and Hu Qiuyuan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在20世纪30年代初的"文艺自由论辩"中,作为左翼盟主的鲁迅并没有正式著文批判胡秋原,而是保持缄默。对于其中的详细缘由,笔者试从对文学"同路人"的态度、对真理的执着守护、对普氏理论的共同见识、众多文艺理论问题上的共鸣等方面进行了推测,以求从中了解鲁迅先生对文论理解的深刻性以及站在历史的高度认识问题的敏锐性、预见的深远性,感受鲁迅先生的人格魅力。  As the leader of the "the left wing",Lu Xun did not criticize Hu Qiuyuan by writing articles formally,but kept silent in the debate of literary liberty in the 1930s.About the reasons,the author tries to conjecture it from such four aspects.The first one is the attitude toward the friends in literature;the second one is the safeguard to the truth;the third one is the common opinion toward the theory of Plekhanov;and the last one is the common understanding to a lot of literary problems.From which,we try to understand Lu Xun's depth to understanding the articles,perception to recognizing the problems,and accuracy to forecast by standing in a height of history,as well as feeling Lu Xun's great charm of his personality.
作者 徐元绍
出处 《山东教育学院学报》 2007年第4期27-29,共3页 Journal of Shandong Education Institute
关键词 鲁迅 胡秋原 缄默 文艺自由论辩 Lu Xun Hu Qiuyuan Keeping silent The debate of literary liberty
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1托洛茨基.文学与革命[M].北京:外国文学出版社,1992.35.
  • 2郭沫若.英雄树[J].创造月刊,1928,(8).
  • 3李初梨.《怎样地建设革命文学》[J].文化批判,1928,.
  • 4徐匀 鲁迅.通信.语丝,1928,4(34).
  • 5鲁迅.革命时代的文学[A].鲁迅全集(第3卷)[C].北京:人民文学出版社,1981 .423.

共引文献120

同被引文献15

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部