期刊文献+

奥美拉唑加法莫替丁治疗消化性溃疡的效费比研究 被引量:1

A Study of Effective than Fee Expense on Peptic Ulcer treated by Omeprazole and Famotidine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察奥美拉唑加法莫替丁联用与单用奥美拉唑治疗消化性溃疡的疗效和费用比。方法将89例消化性溃疡患者随机分为治疗组(45例)和对照组(44例),在治疗组用奥美拉唑20mg,1次/d,加法莫替丁20mg,2次/d;对照组单用奥美拉唑20mg,2次/d,两组均加甲硝唑和阿莫西林。结果治疗组与对照组治愈率比较差异无显著性(P>0.05),医药费用明显降低(P<0.05),两组均无不良反应。结论奥美拉唑加法莫替丁治疗消化性溃疡疗效及不良反应与单用奥美拉唑相当,但费用明显减低。 Objective To observe the effect and cost ratio of omeprazole and famolidine on peptic ulcer. Methods Eighty-nine patients with peptic ulcer were randomized into two groups: control group (45 cases received omeprazole 20mg qd and famotidine 20rag bid ) ;Treatment group(44 cases received omeprazole 20mg bid). The two groups all received arilin and amoxicillin. Results The effective rates of treatment group and control group were no significance between them ( P 〉 0.05) , medical expenses obviously depressed ( P 〈 0.05 ), the difference of adverse effect was no signicance. Conclusion For those patients with duodenal ulcer and hemorrhage, losec is a safe and effective medicine and worth spreading in clinic,which has high hemostatic role and no apparent side effect. The effect and adverse effect of omeprazole 20mg qd and famotidine 20mg bid correspond to only omeprazole 20rag bid, but expense depressed obviously.
出处 《潍坊医学院学报》 2007年第4期331-332,共2页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Weifang
关键词 法莫替丁 奥美拉唑 消化性溃疡 疗效 费用 Famotidine Omeprazole Peptic ulcer Effection Expense
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献4

  • 1姚希贤,胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,1995年,4卷,267页
  • 2姚希贤,中华内科杂志,1995年,34卷,208页
  • 3贾博琦,中华消化杂志,1995年,15卷,增刊,1页
  • 4姚希贤,胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,1993年,2卷,16页

共引文献101

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部