摘要
这里对朗吉弩斯的《论崇高》作了全新的阐释,认为其学术理路是清晰的,其中显在的是修辞学理路,隐在的是美学理路;而"崇高"之所以由此而成为真正的美学范畴,主要是因朗吉弩斯依循美学理路,把崇高的探讨纳入了人性经验的分析,从而为崇高找到了人性的根据和经验的来源;其崇高修辞学思想既承袭了贺拉斯的"合式"理性,又有所突破,表现就是对崇高修辞的特殊性的强调,其意有似于中国文论"文以气为主"的说法。
This thesis made a new interpretation of Longinus' On the Sublime,and concluded that its academic way is clear and it is prominent in the rhetoric concept and hidden is the Aesthetics concept." Sublime" truly belongs to aesthetic category thus,largely because that Longinus follow the Aesthetics concept and discusses sublimity under the analysis of human experience,so as to find a noble human basis and its origin of experience for sublimity;its thinking of sublime rhetoric comes down from the "decorum" reason of Horace and has some breakthrough of it.Its performance is the emphasis on the particularity of the "sublime" rhetoric,and its view is similar to the idea "the quality of an article depends on its style "in Chinese literary criticism.
出处
《辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
2007年第5期81-84,共4页
Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)