期刊文献+

产品责任中纯经济损失之判解研究

On the Judgment of Pure Economic Loss in Product Liability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 产品责任中的纯经济损失不仅成为国际社会关注的理论焦点,而且成为各国法院面临的共同难题。缺陷产品所致的纯经济损失案件已在我国崭露头角,我国法院对该类损失的保护做出了有益的尝试,然而立法的缺失却使法院在司法实务中处于十分尴尬的境地。不过,从法解释学的角度看,我国现有的立法资源还是为产品责任中的纯经济损失留下了一定的生存空间。问题的关键在于立法部门应当尽快明确具体地确立相关的立法,为产品责任中的纯经济损失提供合理的保护路径。 The pure economic loss in product liability has become not only a theoretical concern to the international community, but also a common challenge facing the courts in various countries. The cases of pure economic loss resulting from product defect have arisen in China, and our courts have also made useful attempts to protect such losses, but the lack of legislation make courts be in a very embarrassing situation in judicial practice. However, from the angle of laws interpretation the current legislation resources has also provided certain space for the survival of pure economic loss in product liability. The key issue is that the legislation body should establish related laws definitely and specifically as soon as possible so as to provide a lawful and reasonable way to protect pure economic loss in product liability.
作者 黄莉萍 朱娟
出处 《江苏工业学院学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第3期35-38,99,共5页 Journal of Jiangsu Polyetchnic University:Social Science Edition
关键词 转移损失 产品自身损害 产品责任 transferred loss, product damage, product liability
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[1]Mauro Bussani,Vernon Palmer and Francesco Parisi,Liability For Pure Financial Loss In Europe:An Economic Restatement[J].in American Journal of Comparative Law,Volume 51,NO.1,2003:45-46.
  • 2[2][德]克里斯蒂安·冯·巴尔,乌里希·德罗布尼希.欧洲合同法与侵权法及财产法的互动[M].吴越,译.北京:法律出版社,2007:107.
  • 3李昊.论英美侵权法中过失引起的纯经济上损失的赔偿规则[J].比较法研究,2005,19(5):64-74. 被引量:25
  • 4[5][德]马克西米利安·福克斯.侵权行为法[M].晓琨,译.北京:法律出版社,2006:29-31.
  • 5[6]Francesco Parisi,Liability for Pure Economic Loss:Revisiting The Econimic Foundation of A Legal Doctrine[A].in M.Bussani and V.Palmer,Liability for Pure Economic Loss in Europe:Frontiers of Tort Law[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003:6.
  • 6[7]Jay M.Feinman,The Economic Loss Rule and Private Ordering[J].in Arizona Law Riew,Volume 48,2006:818.
  • 7[8]Dr.Ronen Perry,Relational Economic Loss:An Integrated Economic Justification For The Exclusionary Rule[J].in Rutgers Law Review,Volume 56,NO.3,2004:784.
  • 8[德]卡尔·拉伦茨.法学方法论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003..
  • 9谢晓尧,吴思罕.论一般条款的确定性[J].法学评论,2004,22(3):21-28. 被引量:27
  • 10张新宝.侵权行为法的一般条款[J].法学研究,2001,23(4):42-54. 被引量:159

二级参考文献18

共引文献238

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部