期刊文献+

火炮系统效能综合评价与指标无量纲化处理的研究 被引量:10

Study on Integrated Evaluation of Gun System Effectiveness and Treatment of Index Non-Dimension
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对评判火炮武器系统综合效能量化复杂、因素多,建立了火炮系统效能分析比较模型。在计算指标权重时,运用了专家组综合判断矩阵,体现了专家的群组意愿;比较了理想指标值处理法、Z-Score法、“线性投影法”3种指标无量纲化处理方法的优劣,选择“线性投影法”,一方面使各指标无量纲处理后的评价标准值在(0~1)范围内,避免了因指标原始值大小与散布程度使评价结果的失真;另一方面也避免了因选取理想指标值的主观性而造成的误差。采用该方法为对比分析自行火炮、牵引火炮和轮式车载火炮费用一效能分析提供了依据。 Aimed at the complicated quantitative analysis of gun system effectiveness and concerned tremendous factors, it is necessary to establish a comparison model of effectiveness analysis. In the course of index weight calculation, comprehensive judgment matrix of the expert team was used to represent the wish of the expert team. By means of comparison of three index non-dimension management methods such as ideal index value processing method, Z-Score method, and linear projection method, the method of linear projection was selected. The method has two advantages. On the one hand, standard evaluation values were put in the range of 0-1 after process of index non-dimension so as to prevent the evaluation result from being distorted due to the original value of index and distribution degree. On the other hand, the method avoided the error resulted from the subjective selection of ideal index value. The method of linear projection can provide a solid foundation for comparative cost-efficiency of self-propelled, towed, and wheeled vehicle-mounted gun system.
出处 《火炮发射与控制学报》 北大核心 2007年第3期1-4,共4页 Journal of Gun Launch & Control
关键词 非标准分析 火炮系统 效能分析 线性投影法 nonstandard analysis gun system effectiveness analysis linear projection method
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献7

  • 1[4]毛志峰. 区域可持续发展的理论与对策[M]. 武汉:湖北科学技术出版社, 2000.
  • 2[5]Marshall J U. Beyond the rank-size rule: A new description model of city size[J]. Urban Geography, 1999, 18(1):36-55.
  • 3[6]Stern D I. The capital theory approach to sustainability: A critical appraisal[J], Journal of Economic Issues, 1997,31:145-173.
  • 4[7]John A A, Pecchenino R A. International and intergenerational environmental externalities[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1997,99:371-387.
  • 5[8]Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Sustainable Development-OECD Policy Approaches for the 21st Century[M]. Paris: OEDC 1997.
  • 6陶志,郭松青.一种构造群组综合判断矩阵的方法[J].沈阳航空工业学院学报,1997,14(2):51-54. 被引量:3
  • 7许学强,张俊军.广州城市可持续发展的综合评价[J].地理学报,2001,56(1):54-63. 被引量:162

共引文献68

同被引文献98

引证文献10

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部