摘要
政府可以解决公司治理变迁中的市场不足与失灵,并在推动公司治理变迁方面存在诸多优势。基于自身综合效用的考虑,政府会决定是否对公司治理变迁进行介入。一般来说,政府可以通过引导公司治理改革的方向、建立公司治理变迁的法制基础和拓展公司治理的选择空间等方式介入公司治理的变迁。然而,由于政府的双重身份与"掠夺之手",造成了政府行为的"本质两难"。因此,政府介入公司治理变迁应该有个限度。
Governments can not only solve market insufficiency and failure,but also have some advantages in pushing the change of corporate governance.After measuring their comprehensive utility,governments decide whether to intervene in the change of corporate governance or not.Generally,there are three methods for governments to intervene.First,governments lead the change of corporate governance.Second,governments set up the foundation of legal system.Third,governments extend the space of institutional selection.However,there is fundamental dilemma for governments because of double status and 'grabbing hand'.So,governments should intervene in the change of corporate governance within limits.
出处
《中南财经政法大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第5期118-124,共7页
Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
基金
国家自然科学基金资助项目"中国家族企业治理结构转型的经验研究"(70472055)
关键词
公司治理
政府介入
规制
Corporate Governance
Government Intervening
Regulation