期刊文献+

SY-28、SY-20和MDX4-4210硅橡胶吸水率和溶解率的对比测定 被引量:4

Comparative study of the water sorption and solubility of SY-28、SY-20 and MDX4-4210 silicone elastomers
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:对比SY-28、SY-20和MDX4-4210硅橡胶的吸水率和溶解率。方法:在相同条件下,测定SY-28、SY-20和MDX4-4210硅橡胶的吸水率、溶解率,对其物理性能加以评价,并进行统计学分析。结果:SY-28硅橡胶第8周的吸水率为3.112%,与MDX4-4210硅橡胶(3.012%)相似;SY-28硅橡胶第8周的溶解率为0.4401%,高于MDX4-4210硅橡胶(0.3179%)。SY-20硅橡胶第8周的吸水率和溶解率分别为3.501%,0.4756%,均高于MDX4-4210硅橡胶的吸水率和溶解率。结论:SY-28、SY-20硅橡胶能够满足赝复材料的临床要求,但仍需对材料及配方进行修改与完善,降低其吸水率和溶解率。 Objective.To compare the water sorption and solubility of SY-28,SY-20 and MDX4-4210 silicone elastomers. Method:The water sorption and solubility of three kinds of silicone elastomers were examined and evaluated under the same condition.Thirty specimens of each material were tested and data were collected at 1-8 weeks. Result: The results showed that the means of percentage about water sorption at 8 weeks was 3.112% for SY-28, and 3.012% for MDX4-4210, which showed no significant differences: the solubility at 8 weeks was 0.4401% for SY-28, which showed higher than that of MDX4-4210 (0.3179%). The means of percentage about the water sorption and solubility at 8 weeks were 3.501% and 0.4756% for SY-20, which were higher than those of MDX4-4210 (3.012%, 0.3179%). Conclusion: The results of this study have clinical implications because the water sorption and solubility may affect the long-term life expectancy of silicone elastomer. Based on the present study, it appears that SY-28 and SY-20 silicone elastomers are suitable for use in fabricating of clinical prostheses, but the water sorption and solubility should be improved as the prosthestic materials that often contacts with water.
出处 《临床口腔医学杂志》 2007年第9期518-520,共3页 Journal of Clinical Stomatology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(30572059)
关键词 硅橡胶:吸水率 溶解率 silicone elastomers water sorption solubility
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Hadary AE,Drummond JL.Comparative study of water sorption,solubility,and tensile bond strength of two soft lining materials[J].J Prosthet Dent,2000,83 (3):356-361.
  • 2Polyzois GL Evaluation of a new silicone elastomer for maxillofacial prostheses[J].J Prosthodont,1995,4 (1):38-41.
  • 3Aziz T,Waters M,Jagger R.Analysis of the properties of silicone rubber maxillofacial prosthetic materials[J].J Dent,2003,31 (1):67-74.
  • 4Yap A,Lee CM.Water sorption and solubility of resin-modified polyalkenoate cements[J].Journal of Oral Rehabilitation,1997,24:310-314.
  • 5ASTM Standards (D570-98):Test Method for Water Absorption of Plastics.Annual Book of ASTM Standards.1998,11:1-4.
  • 6Kawano F,Dootz EF,Koran A,et al.Sorption and solubility of 12 soft denture liners[J].J Prosthetic Dent,1994,72 (4):393-398.
  • 7Dinckal Yanikoglu N,Yesil Duymus Z.Comparative study of water sorption and solubility of soft lining materials in the different solutions[J].Dent Mater J,2004,23 (2):233-239.
  • 8Hekimoglu C,Anil N.Sorption and solubility of denture liners after accelerated aging[J].Am J Dent,1999,12(1):44-46.
  • 9刘峰 赵信义.几种义齿软衬垫材料的吸水率及溶出率的比较.实用口腔医学杂志,1996,12(7):122-124.
  • 10Polyzois GL,Tarantili PA,Frangou MJ,et al.Physical properties of a silicone prosthetic elastomer stored in simulated skin secretions[J].J Prosthet Dent,2000,83 (5):572-577.

共引文献2

同被引文献423

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部