期刊文献+

森林限额采伐制度的经济学分析 被引量:13

Economics Analysis on the Institution of Forest Felling Quota
下载PDF
导出
摘要 用新制度经济学的制度成本—制度收益的制度绩效分析方法,引入斯密德的状态、结构、绩效(SSP)分析范式,对中国森林限额采伐制度的绩效进行分析。通过对该制度成本和收益的比较得出:森林限额采伐制度的成本大于收益,制度设计与目标产生了背离。建议对生态公益林政府要进一步加强管治,而对商品林逐步取消森林限额采伐制度,推进市场化改革。 The paper applies institutional performance analysis of comparing institutional cost and institutional revenue, and brings in the analysis paradigm of state-structure-performance to analyze the Institution of forest felling quota in Chain. By comparing of institutional cost and institutional revenue,the result is: the institutional cost of forest felling quota is much more than its revenue. Based on the analysis, the suggestions are put forward: on one hand, the government should strengthen construct the non-commercial forest, and on the other hand, the quota on commercial forest should be cancelled gradually.
出处 《林业经济问题》 北大核心 2007年第3期253-256,283,共5页 Issues of Forestry Economics
关键词 森林限额采伐 制度成本 制度收益 建议 forest felling quota institutional cost institutional revenue suggestions
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献28

  • 1李周.政府参与在协调林业发展诸关系中的作用[J].林业经济,1993(3):9-13. 被引量:3
  • 2上官增前.论市场经济与森林采伐限额制度[J].林业经济,1995(1):45-49. 被引量:2
  • 3斯韦托扎尔·平乔维奇.产权经济学[M].经济科学出版社,1999..
  • 4高兆蔚.福建省森林分类经营总体设想与采伐管理探讨[J].林业经济问题,1999,.
  • 5国家林业局.《森林资源清查统计资料》第一次到第五次[M].中国林业出版社,1973-1998..
  • 6国家林业局.《中国林业年鉴1996》[M].中国林业出版社,1997..
  • 7国家林业局.《全国森林资源统计》[Z].,1983-1989..
  • 8Hart, Oliver,Shleifer, Andrei &Vishny, Robert W, 1997, "The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons"Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, (4), 1127-61.
  • 9Hartman, R, 1976, "The Harvesting Decision When a Standing Forest Has Value", Economic Inquiry, 14,52-8.
  • 10Holmstrom, Bengt, and Milgrom, Paul, 1991, "Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contract, Asset Ownership, and Job Design",Journal of Law, Economics and Orgination , Vol7, Special Issue, 24-52.

共引文献369

同被引文献161

引证文献13

二级引证文献102

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部