期刊文献+

肝素抗凝治疗急性冠脉综合征的对比研究 被引量:1

Comparisons of Different Heparin Treatment for Acute Coronary Syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察不同抗凝方案治疗急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的疗效和安全性。方法入选对象为不稳定性心绞痛或非Q波心肌梗死患者,入选前48h以内至少有一次心绞痛发作,ST段无抬高。将120例入选病例随机分为静脉滴注普通肝素(UH)组和皮下注射低相对分子质量肝素(LMWH)组,UH组以UH240u/kg·d^-1分两次静脉滴注,连续10d,维持aPTT于60-85s或ACT于250-300s(正常值1.5-2.5倍)。LMWH组予LMWH5000μ,每日两次,皮下注射,连续10d。观察终点:随访治疗30d内发生急性心肌梗死、心脏性或非心脏性死亡和药物治疗无法控制的心绞痛需血运重建例数。住院治疗至少10d,随访至治疗后30d。结果两组用药期间平均胸痛发作次数差异无显著性,但肝素组有更多的患者需口服硝酸甘油缓解胸痛;死亡率、复合终点事件(死亡、心肌梗死和药物治疗无法控制的心绞痛)在LMWH组明显下降。LMWH组出血事件明显少于UH组。结论LMWH皮下注射与连续静脉滴注UH疗效相似,LMWH可明显减少急性冠状动脉综合征30d后死亡和复合心脏事件的发生,发生出血事件较少,应用更为方便安全。 Objective To observe the curative effects and safety.of different anticoagulant strategies on acute coronary syndrome(ACS). Methods 120 patients with unstable angina pectoris(AP) or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction and AP episode for at least 1 time within 48 hours without elevated ST segments were involved and randomized into normal heparin group (n = 60, injected intravenously, with the heparin dose of 240 u/kg·d^-1, twicely and consecutively for 10 d. Meanwhile, the ACT or aFFF was monitored and kept 250 - 300 s in value of ACT or 60 - 85 s of aPTT ) and low molecular weight heparin group( n = 60, received subcutaneous injection with 5000 u LMWH twicely for consecutive 10 d ). Observations on those who turned out acute myocardial infarction within 30 d in the follow-up treatment or died cardiacally or non-cardiacally or uncontrollable AP were terminated. All subjects received hospitalization for no less than 10 d, with a follow- up treatment for 30 d. Results Insignificant differences in average frequency of chest pain were observed during the treatment. However, more cases applying nitroglycerine were demonstrated in heparin group, and an obvious decline in death rate and composite end point event was seen in LMWH group. Bleeding episode was apparently less in LMWH group than that of heparin group. Conclusion LMWH were reduces the incidence of death after ACS and composite cardiac events, with less bleeding complications than heparin, thus with more convenient and safer application.
出处 《血栓与止血学》 2007年第5期209-211,215,共4页 Chinese Journal of Thrombosis and Hemostasis
关键词 急性冠状动脉综合征 低相对分子质量肝素 普通肝素 Acute Coronary Syndrome Low Molecular Weight Heparin Unfraction heparin
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献13

  • 1朱兰英,吴永贵,毛海萍,安业浩,彭文兴,李欣,曾牡华,陈惠珍.单剂量低分子量肝素在血液透析抗凝中的应用[J].中华肾脏病杂志,1996,12(1):32-35. 被引量:91
  • 2杨寅柯,肖苏红,贺蓉,邓常青,陈筱春,何晓凡,李俊成,贺石林.低分子量肝素对大鼠内毒素休克的保护作用[J].中国危重病急救医学,1996,8(3):132-135. 被引量:10
  • 3Kay R,New England J Medicine,1995年,24期,1588页
  • 4Curier J W,J Am Coll Cardiol,1991年,17卷,6期,118页
  • 5Linhardt RJ, Loganathan D,Alhakim A, et al. Oligosaccharide mapping of Low Molecular Weight Heparins: Structure and activitydifferences[J]. J Med Chem,1990,33:1639- 1645
  • 6Collignon. Pharmacokinetie profiles comparison between the three subcutaneous LMWH[J]. Thrombo Heamost,1995,73(4) :630- 640
  • 7Montalescot G,Drbinski G, Meurin P, et al. Effect of prostacyclin on the pulmonay vascular tone and cardiac dysfunction in heart failure[J]. JACC,2000,36:110- 114
  • 8Cohen M, Demers C, Gurfinkel EP, et al. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfraetionated heparin for unstablecoronary artery dlsease[J ]. N Engl J Meal,1997,337 :447- 452
  • 9Antman EM, Mceabe CH, Gurfinkel EP,et al. Enoxaparin prevents death and cardiac ischemie events in unstableangina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of the thrombolysis inmyocardial in-farction (TIMI)ⅡB trial[J]. Circulation,1999 ,100 :1593- 1601
  • 10Mestre M, Uzan A, Sedivy P, et al. Enoxaparin( Clexane, Lovenox), alow molecular weight heparin enhances t-PA -induced coro-nary thrombus lysls in anesthetized dogs without inducing hypocoegulability[J]. J Thromb Res,1992,66(2 3) :191 - 206

共引文献282

同被引文献2

  • 1Merlini PA, Bauer KA,Oltrona L, et al. Persistent activation of coagulation mechanism in unstable angina and myocardial infarction. Circulation, 1994,90 : 61 - 68.
  • 2Clinical Collaborative Study Group of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (Correspondent: HU Dayi, XU Juntang. Beijing Red Cross Chaoyang Hospital, Beijing University of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100020, China).不稳定性心绞痛、急性非Q波心肌梗死不同抗栓疗法的对比研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2000,28(1):18-21. 被引量:172

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部