女性主义法学方法的实案分析

Case Study of Feminist Approaches to Jurisprudence

虽然对女性主义方法论的批评和质疑很多,但是作为一种追求性别平等的法律方法,女性主义方法仍不失为一种思考的视角。任何法学方法,最后都是为了案件得到正确判决,因此本文目的不在于提出理论,主要是结合美国宪法案件来分析女性主义方法在案件中的实际运用。由于中国的历史和文化传统中女性通常是"不在场"的,虽然宪法明文规定男女平等,但是司法实践中不平等却时有发生。笔者希望通过介绍女性主义方法能给出一些启示。

As a legal methodology to seek equality for men and women, feminist jurisprudence is still worth considering, although there are criticisms and doubts about the methodology of feminist jurisprudence. Since any legal approach strives to give correct sentencing, this article analyzes practical application of feminist jurisprudence based on two United States constitutional cases rather than discuss theoretical issues. Inequality often occurs in judicial practice, although equality is clearly stated in our constitution, for in Chinese history and traditional Chinese culture, women were ＂absent＂ from social activities. The author aims to give people some enlightenment through the introduction of the approach.