期刊文献+

对腹腔镜全子宫切除术患者实施临床路径的效果评价

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨临床路径(clinical pathway,CP)应用于腹腔镜全子宫切除术患者的效果。方法将2004年1月至2005年12月行腹腔镜全子宫切除术的患者160例随机分成CP组和常规护理组各80例,比较两组的平均住院日、住院费用及出院患者满意率。结果CP组的平均住院日、住院费用明显低于常规组(P<0.01);而出院患者的满意率较常规组有显著提高(P<0.05);CP组的成本效益比为89.79%,常规组为72.68%。结论临床路径应用于腹腔镜全子宫切除术可以明显缩短平均住院时间,降低诊疗费用,使患者获得最佳的医疗护理服务。
出处 《解放军护理杂志》 2007年第09A期41-42,共2页 Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1Shadish Jr., WR, Cook TD, Leviton LC. Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories of Practice [M]. Newbury Park : Sage Publications, 1991 : 17- 19.
  • 2Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth Generation Evaluation[M].Newbury Park : Sage Publications. 1989 : 21- 24.
  • 3Mateo MA, Newton C. Managing variances in case management [J]. Nursing Case Management, 1996,1 ( 1 ) :45- 51.
  • 4Yandell B. Critical paths at Alliant health system[J]. Quality Management in Health Care, 1995,3(2) : 55- 64.
  • 5Brailer DJ. Clinical decision support: Managing quality in integrated delivery systems[J]. Quality Management in Health Care, 1996,4(2) :24-33.
  • 6Cheah T S. The impact of clinical guidelines and clinical pathways on medical practice: Effectiveness and medicolegal aspects[J ]. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 1988,27(4) :533 - 539.
  • 7Dennis E,Weiland M D. Why use clinical pathways rather than practice guideline? [ J ]. Am J Surg, 1997,174 : 592 - 594.
  • 8Kitchiner D J, Bundred P E. Ctinical pathways[J]. Med J Aust, 1999,172(2) :54 - 55.
  • 9Anders RL, Ornellas EM, Acute management of patients with hip fracture: a research literature review, Orthopaedic Nursing, 1997, 2:31.
  • 10Bell L, Solieri A, West P, et al. The development and benefits of nursing protocols for fractured neck of femur patients, JAN, 1997, 6:1080.

共引文献281

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部