期刊文献+

经典现代化理论的解释困境及其再反思 被引量:2

Further Reflection on the Explanation Plight of Classical Modernization Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪50年代以来,经典现代化理论作为欧洲社会现代化进程的概括,明显受着社会进化论的影响,而且,社会进化论的两大缺陷从一开始就注定经典现代化理论诠释力的虚弱及其诠释空间的狭小。20世纪后半期,面对非西方国家现代化的实践,经典现代化理论分析视角的单一性、分析方法的局限性、分析结论的绝对性、分析模式的二元对立性注定使其陷入前所未有的解释困境。对经典现代化理论的再反思,无疑将进一步深化人类对"现代化"的认识,从而不断为现代化理论的重建赋予新的时代内容。 Since 1950s, classical modernization theory as the generalization of the process of Europe society modernization has been affected by Social Darwinism obviously. Two defects of the Social Darwinism have determined that classical modernization theory ' s explanation is weak and room for the explanation is small. After 20th century, non - western countries are engaged in the modernization practice. As perspective is single, analysis method is limited , analysis conclusions are absolute, analysis model is dual, Classical modernization theory encounters the explained plight unprecedented. Today, further reflection on the explanation plight of classical modernization theory will deepen the understanding of modernization, and give new times information to modernization theory.
作者 曹海林
出处 《盐城工学院学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第3期13-17,共5页 Journal of Yancheng Institute of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 经典现代化理论 解释困境 反思现代化 elassieal modernization theory the explanation plight reflect modernization
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献13

  • 1W.茨阿波夫,李鹏程.现代化理论与社会发展的不同路向[J].国外社会科学,1997(4):29-38. 被引量:21
  • 2Boyne,B. & Rattansi,A.(1990)"The Theory and Politics of Posunodemism: By Way of an Introduction", in Boyne & Rattansi (eds.) Posunodemism and Society, N.Y. Macmillan, P9.
  • 3Bauman, Z. (1992)Intimations of Postmodernity, London:Rougledge ,Pvii.
  • 4Owen, D. (1997)Sociology after Postmodemism, London:Sage, P14.
  • 5Giddens,A. (1990)The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press, P171.
  • 6Beck, U.(1994)The Reinvention of Politics, Beck, U., Giddens,A., Lash, S.(eds.)Reflexive Modernization, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • 7Beck, U.(1992)Rise Society: Towards a New Modernity,London:Sage.
  • 8林达·赫哲仁著.《后现代主义的政治学》.台湾:骆驼出版社1996年版,第12页.
  • 9文军.《后现代与后现代社会学研究》.《世纪中国》2002年6月21日.www.cc.org.cn.
  • 10Mills, C.W. (1959)The Sociological Imagination, New York: Oxford University Press.

共引文献34

同被引文献40

引证文献2

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部